Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

IERUS TECHNOLOGIES INC

IERUS TECHNOLOGIES INC received $37.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 22 awards (+688% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $91.4M. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($35.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$37.5M
New awards
22
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
13%
UEI
H1ZRXJKFZ4K7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.7MFY2017
  2. 1.7MFY2018
  3. 3.7MFY2019
  4. 7.6MFY2020
  5. 10.5MFY2021
  6. 2.9MFY2022
  7. 5.5MFY2023
  8. 11.6MFY2024
  9. 4.8MFY2025
  10. 37.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 14 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$37.5M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition13%
    US 39% · $4.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions13%
    US 8.8% · $4.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Oct 9, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· HQ085326CE001
  2. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 7, 2024 – Apr 15, 2026· HQ086024C7121
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Nov 17, 2023 – Feb 3, 2026· N6426724C0050
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· HQ086026CE047
  5. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Mar 7, 2025 – Feb 26, 2026· HQ086025C7415
  6. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Aug 5, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· W5170124C0138
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jun 24, 2020 – Feb 3, 2026· FA865020C5001
  8. Defense Contract Management Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 19, 2021 – Feb 3, 2026· HQ086021C7107

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

IERUS TECHNOLOGIES INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$2.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.3MFY2021
  2. 499.9KFY2022
  3. 200KFY2023
  4. 206.5KFY2024
  5. 155.8KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $475.1K (3 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  3. FORT WAYNE, IN · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (5 subawards)

1 prime

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 5 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 1.3% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.1M paid out · $20.4M received
  • FY2022: $1.7M paid out · $23.8M received
  • FY2023: $357.9K paid out · $7.1M received
  • FY2024: $964K paid out · $15.8M received
  • FY2025: $1.2M paid out · $14.5M received
  • FY2026: $475.1K paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

20 companies · $5.8M reported

  1. LOUISVILLE, CO · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. LAWRENCE, KS · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $82.9M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 99 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 34 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DTECHLOGIC LLC$52.9M−4.5% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. GRAY ANALYTICS, INC.$25.2M+33% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development services
  3. SCITEC INNOVATIONS LLC$76.7M−55% in FY2026
    PRINCETON, NJ · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • IERUS TechnologiesAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$142K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$349K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$72K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$90K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$142K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$45K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES18 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE18 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AGM Consulting Services, Inc.$297K
    14 reports
  2. The Consilio Group$52K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.