Federal contractor · TORRANCE, CA

INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS INC

INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS INC received $29.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 49 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $293.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($10M).

Obligations · FY2026
$29.3M
New awards
49
Sole-source
35%
Single offer
37%
UEI
C4Y5CNN55L37
Parent company
INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS, INC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.4MFY2017
  2. 29.7MFY2018
  3. 31.2MFY2019
  4. 26.5MFY2020
  5. 26.7MFY2021
  6. 37.1MFY2022
  7. 24.9MFY2023
  8. 25MFY2024
  9. 46.4MFY2025
  10. 29.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 9 awards
  4. 14 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 4 awards
  7. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$26.6M91%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$2.6M9.0%
  3. Professional services$5,4300.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition72%
    US 39% · $21M
  • Sole-source awards35%
    US 30% · $10.3M
  • Single-offer competitions37%
    US 8.7% · $10.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. General Services Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Dec 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2026· 47QFLA26F0004
  2. Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Research & development· Jun 16, 2023 – Oct 31, 2025· FA460023C0005
  3. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 24, 2025 – May 28, 2026· FA860625CB007
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· SP470126C0028
  5. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Jul 15, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· W5170124C0220
  6. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Mar 17, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· W5170126CA078
  7. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Jul 24, 2025 – May 15, 2026· W5170125CA205
  8. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Apr 1, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W5170125CA122

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$3.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 783.6KFY2021
  2. 545.4KFY2022
  3. 1.8MFY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. -4.4KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 11.021 · Noaa Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Project grant· Aug 10, 2023 – Dec 18, 2025· NA23OAR0210339

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $393.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2022: $500K paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2024: $624.7K paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $393.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $1.1M reported

  1. NORTH DARTMOUTH, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. ENABLING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION INC$200K
    WARNER ROBINS, GA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $18.3M reported

  1. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 11 subawards · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. SIMI VALLEY, CA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LYNNTECH INC.$50M−46% in FY2026
    COLLEGE STATION, TX · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services+2 more
  2. PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.$151.5M−66% in FY2026
    ANDOVER, MA · 5 entities · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services+2 more
  3. OCEANIT LABORATORIES INC$68.1M−62% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Intellisense Systems, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$70K
5 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$190K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$120K
    5 reports
  2. 2026$70K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Small business10 reports
  2. Defense2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES10 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE10 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Stapleton & Associates, LLC$160K
    6 reports
  2. Potomac Capitol Associates, Inc.$30K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.