Federal contractor · MESA, AZ

INTER-COASTAL ELECTRONICS, LLC

INTER-COASTAL ELECTRONICS, LLC received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−88% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $172.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.1M
New awards
14
Sole-source
65%
Single offer
35%
UEI
TP14Y7CMDKZ6
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13.4MFY2017
  2. 22.1MFY2018
  3. 24.3MFY2019
  4. 16.8MFY2020
  5. 18.4MFY2021
  6. 14.7MFY2022
  7. 1.2MFY2023
  8. 42MFY2024
  9. 17.6MFY2025
  10. 2.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$1.4M66%
    11 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$751.1K35%
    1 awards
  3. Defense Logistics Agency-$16K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$2.6M70%
  2. Professional services$1M28%
  3. Construction & real property$70K1.9%

Where the work was performed

  1. Maricopa County, AZ$2.9M100%
  2. Coryell County, TX$751.1K35%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.1M
  • Sole-source awards65%
    US 30% · $1.4M
  • Single-offer competitions35%
    US 8.8% · $751.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$1.4M
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. CHAFF DELIVERY ORDER FOR AVIATION TRAINING DEVICES$16.8M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 29, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W900KK24F0129
  2. PROCURE 34 LASER INTEGRATED FIELD TRAINING SYSTEMS (LIFTS) TO INTEGRATE WITH THE CUSTOMER'S EXISTING TUBE-LAUNCHED OPTICALLY-TRACKED WIRE GUIDED IMPROVED TARGETING ACQUISITION SYSTEM. ALSO NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT.$12.2M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 25, 2021 – Nov 4, 2025· W900KK21C0021
  3. TESS HARDWARE PROCUREMENT$10.1M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 9, 2025 – May 6, 2026· W900KK25FA129
  4. NETHERLANDS IDIQ DO 04 PROCUREMENT TESS B KITS.$8.8M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 7, 2024 – May 11, 2026· W900KK24F0042
  5. CONTRACT AWARD FOR TACTICAL ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR THE COUNTRY OF MOROCCO.$7.8M
    Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Jan 28, 2022 – Jan 28, 2026· W900KK22C0009
  6. PROCUREMENT OF TACTICAL ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION SYSTEM TO THE NETHERLANDS FOR THEIR CHINOOK AIRCRAFT TO INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY HARDWARE FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE SYSTEM ON THE AIRCRAFT.$7.2M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 6, 2024 – May 14, 2026· W900KK24F0105
  7. LBA TESS B-KITS&SPARES KITS$5.8M
    Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 19, 2019 – Dec 4, 2025· W900KK19C0039
  8. TACTICAL ENGAGEMENT SIMULATION SYSTEMS TESS$4.8M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Coryell County, TX· Professional services· Sep 16, 2022 – Sep 24, 2026· 47QFWA22F0036

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BELL TEXTRON INC$1.1M100%
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $13.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $4.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $29.4M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$17.7M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 119 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BELL TEXTRON INC$6.4M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$3.3M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ACUITY - PT&C, LLC$35.1M−39% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 2 entities · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TECNICA Y PROYECTOS TYPSA FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES$41M−96% in FY2026
    RIYADH, SAU · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. THE MASON & HANGER GROUP INC.$35.2M+86% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON, KY · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Inter-Coastal ElectronicsAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$280K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports
  3. Natl Guard6 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Porter Group, LLC$280K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.