Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

INTREPID LLC

INTREPID LLC received $6.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−97% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4B. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($3.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.5M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.8%
Single offer
45%
UEI
HNK6ED5J3BN9
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 92.5MFY2017
  2. 93.7MFY2018
  3. 99.9MFY2019
  4. 130.8MFY2020
  5. 155.2MFY2021
  6. 180.5MFY2022
  7. 190.9MFY2023
  8. 222.8MFY2024
  9. 225.7MFY2025
  10. 6.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Missile Defense Agency$3.5M54%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Army$2.9M45%
    7 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$51.7K0.8%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$93.8M99.9%
  2. Equipment maintenance$51.7K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Arlington County, VA$93.8M100%
  2. Newport News city, VA$60K0.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition46%
    US 39% · $3M
  • Sole-source awards0.8%
    US 30% · $51.7K
  • Single-offer competitions45%
    US 8.8% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$51.7K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING - BUSINESS INITIATIVES II$340.2M
    Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Research & development· Apr 30, 2024 – May 28, 2026· W9126024F5009
  2. SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT (SETAS) PROGRAM - INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE AND PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE STAFF.$278.3M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jul 19, 2018 – Jan 23, 2026· W9113M18F0012
  3. SETA SUPPORT SERVICES FOR IFMC$77.9M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jan 16, 2024 – May 12, 2026· W9113M24F0006
  4. VISUAL INFORMATION AND PRODUCTION CENTER (VIPC) COMMERCIAL SERVICES$34.7M
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Dec 31, 2019 – May 20, 2026· HQ085820C0004
  5. ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT SERVICES - BASE$23.5M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Aug 23, 2018 – Apr 12, 2026· W911W618F401B
  6. ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEER SUPPORT SERVICE$17.6M
    Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Professional services· Oct 13, 2022 – Apr 22, 2026· W911W623F0001
  7. IGF::CT::IGF$4.8M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Nov 4, 2016 – Feb 23, 2026· 0001
  8. ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT SERVICE$3M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Apr 1, 2026 – May 19, 2026· W911W626FA002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $775K (6 subawards)

4 sub-recipients

  1. CRL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$810.8K100%
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 3 subawards
  2. CBEYONDATA LLC$50.9K6.6%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. MDUBB FINANCIAL LLC$25.8K3.3%
    NAPLES, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 12% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $95.4M paid out · $5.8M received
  • FY2022: $133.5M paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2023: $115.1M paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2024: $141.6M paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2025: $86.1M paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2026: $775K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

57 companies · $572.5M reported

  1. THOMPSON GRAY, INC.$112.4M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 52 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ALTA VIA CONSULTING LLC$84M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 43 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. AVIATION & MISSILE SOLUTIONS, LLC$74.2M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 19 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $15.5M reported

  1. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$5.9M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 63 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$4.5M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$3M
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAG DS CORP$351.9M−33% in FY2026
    TINTON FALLS, NJ · 4 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. JOINT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$253M−45% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. QED SYSTEMS, LLC$215.3M−39% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.