Federal contractor · MILWAUKEE, WI

JOHNSON CONTROLS INC

JOHNSON CONTROLS INC received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $54.1M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
18
Sole-source
92%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z2N8C3NL8FW5
Parent company
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC company family: 139 registered entities, $82M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INCMILWAUKEE, WI · Family page
    $65.8M
  2. $8.6M
  3. $3.1M
  4. $2.8M
  5. SHOPPERTRAK RCT LLCMILWAUKEE, WI
    $38.2K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2017
  2. 6.7MFY2018
  3. 5.2MFY2019
  4. 4.4MFY2020
  5. 6.4MFY2021
  6. 9.6MFY2022
  7. 9.9MFY2023
  8. 3.5MFY2024
  9. 2.2MFY2025
  10. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. U.S. Coast Guard-$7,6640.0%
    1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$1.3M76%
  2. Construction & real property$368.5K21%
  3. IT & telecom$55.3K3.2%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition92%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards92%
    US 30% · $1.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$7,664

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· Riley County, KS· Equipment maintenance· May 14, 2021 – Sep 25, 2026· 12805B21P0152
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Johnson County, IA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 9, 2022 – Jun 23, 2026· 36C26322P0379
  3. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2023 – Jun 3, 2026· W91ZLK23P0085
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Adams County, CO· Equipment maintenance· Sep 12, 2023 – Aug 26, 2026· 36C25923C0090
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Salt Lake County, UT· Equipment maintenance· Nov 2, 2020 – Feb 24, 2026· 36C25921P0059
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Yavapai County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Sep 20, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· 36C26222P2237
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Montgomery County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2021 – May 29, 2026· 36C24722C0011
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Fresno County, CA· Equipment maintenance· May 18, 2021 – Oct 27, 2025· 36C26121C0056

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $215K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $765.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $191.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $215K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

71 companies · $95.7M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 24 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. CARLSBAD, CA · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  3. WATSONVILLE, CA · 3 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 180 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC$185M+16% in FY2026
    BUFFALO GROVE, IL · 3 entities · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Facilities support servicesNational Institutes of Health · Facilities support servicesVeterans Affairs · Investigation and security services+4 more
  2. EVERGREEN FIRE ALARMS LLC$54.9M−83% in FY2026
    TACOMA, WA · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Communications equipment manufacturingNavy · Investigation and security servicesArmy · Investigation and security services+1 more
  3. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 8 entities · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Communications equipment manufacturingNavy · Communications equipment manufacturingAir Force · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC (139 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • JOHNSON CONTROLS INC.AI match · 99%
  • Johnson Controls InternationalAI match · 91%
Lobbying · 2025
$480K
15 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.2M
$2.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$150.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$844K
    15 reports
  2. 2024$660K
    13 reports
  3. 2025$480K
    15 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code27 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear23 reports
  3. Defense22 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund22 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)19 reports
  6. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  7. Homeland security8 reports
  8. Telecommunications7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES37 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE37 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Tiber Creek Group$470K
    8 reports
  2. Foley & Lardner, LLP$360K
    6 reports
  3. Flywheel Government Solutions$215K
    14 reports
  4. Capitol Hill Consulting Group$120K
    5 reports
  5. Monument Advocacy$70K
    2 reports
  6. SALT POINT STRATEGIES$40K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$83.5K55%
  2. Republican$67K45%

PACs sponsored

  • JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. PAC$244.7K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.