Federal contractor · DAVIDSON, NC

TRANE U.S. INC.

TRANE U.S. INC. received $72.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 215 awards (+20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $508.9M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($23.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$72.2M
New awards
215
Sole-source
6.5%
Single offer
25%
UEI
QJFJBF8ZBUM8
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $72.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. TRANE U.S. INC.DAVIDSON, NC · Family page
    $72.2M
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. TRANE U.S. INC.EL PASO, TX
    $0
  7. TRANE U.S. INC.WESTBROOK, ME
    $0
  8. TRANE U.S. INC.DAVENPORT, IA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 22MFY2017
  2. 35.8MFY2018
  3. 53.9MFY2019
  4. 40.2MFY2020
  5. 38.8MFY2021
  6. 41.7MFY2022
  7. 63.2MFY2023
  8. 81MFY2024
  9. 60.1MFY2025
  10. 72.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 17 awards
  4. 64 awards
  5. 38 awards
  6. 16 awards
  7. 10 awards
  8. 5 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$40.6M56%
  2. Equipment maintenance$14.4M20%
  3. Construction & real property$11.7M16%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$4.7M6.5%
  5. IT & telecom$295.2K0.4%
  6. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$198.3K0.3%
  7. Facilities & utilities$171.1K0.2%
  8. Education & social services$134.2K0.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$23.2M32%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $23M
  • Sole-source awards6.5%
    US 30% · $4.7M
  • Single-offer competitions25%
    US 8.8% · $18.3M
  • Urgency justifications2.7%
    US 5.1% · $1.9M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 11 awards
  2. Department of Justice · 10 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 4 awards
  4. Department of Transportation · 2 awards
  5. Department of the Interior · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jan 26, 2017 – Jan 29, 2026· N6258309F0104
  2. Public Buildings Service· New York County, NY· Construction & real property· Dec 7, 2016 – Jul 1, 2026· GSP0216PV7171
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Professional services· Dec 20, 2018 – Mar 12, 2026· SP060419F8000
  4. Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Professional services· Jan 12, 2017 – Jan 15, 2026· N6258310F0309
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Professional services· Oct 31, 2019 – Apr 24, 2026· SP060420F8000
  6. Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Oct 27, 2016 – Jan 8, 2026· N3943017F1903
  7. Public Buildings Service· Calhoun County, MI· Professional services· Nov 14, 2023 – Sep 28, 2026· 47PF0024F0107
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Aug 7, 2018 – Jan 21, 2026· SP060418F8000

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.5M (12 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $151.5K (2 subawards)

12 primes

  1. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$320.8K7.0%
    DULLES, VA · 1 subaward
  4. ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards
  5. M. C. DEAN, INC.$198.9K4.3%
    TYSONS, VA · 1 subaward
  6. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT$120K2.6%
    COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward
  7. LYNCHBURG, VA · 2 subawards
  8. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward
  9. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  10. HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $12.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $9.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

55 companies · $44.7M reported

  1. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 82 subawards · Household appliances and electrical and electronic goods merchant wholesalers
  2. GREENVILLE, SC · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. COLUMBUS, OH · 14 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 89 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CARROLLTON, TX · 32 entities · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
  2. NORESCO, LLC$279.8M+30% in FY2026
    WESTBOROUGH, MA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Logistics Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
  3. ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING, INC.$70.5M−92% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.