Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C.

GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C. received $64.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 39 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($59.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$64.1M
New awards
39
Sole-source
7.5%
Single offer
8.3%
UEI
ZNDDLJMNCJA7
Parent company
G. S. PRECISION, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $64.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C.WASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $64.1M
  2. RESOLUTE INDUSTRIAL LLCWHEELING, IL
    $455.1K
  3. AMERICAN PACIFIC CORPORATIONCEDAR CITY, UT
    $264.5K
  4. SAN DIEGO COMPOSITES, INCSAN DIEGO, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 91.3MFY2017
  2. 92MFY2018
  3. 131.8MFY2019
  4. 153.7MFY2020
  5. 153.1MFY2021
  6. 171MFY2022
  7. 181.3MFY2023
  8. 172MFY2024
  9. 94.9MFY2025
  10. 64.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$59.5M93%
    37 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$4.8M7.5%
    1 awards
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency-$218K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$66.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$42M65%
  2. Norfolk city, VA$10.2M16%
  3. San Diego County, CA$7.5M12%
  4. Alameda County, CA$4.8M7.5%
  5. Philadelphia County, PA$300K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition16%
    US 39% · $10.2M
  • Sole-source awards7.5%
    US 30% · $4.8M
  • Single-offer competitions8.3%
    US 8.8% · $5.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$4.8M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL AND SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE SUPPORT TO THE DARPA INFORMATION INNOVATION OFFICE (I2O) FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED PROGRAMS, NEW START EFFORTS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION.$100.7M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Jun 23, 2021 – May 22, 2026· N6523621F3020
  2. ESS FOR SEA 05 FOR SHIPS, SHIPS SYSTEMS, WARFARE SYSTEMS, AND SENSORS IN THE SHIP DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT FOR CVNS TECHNICAL AREA.$96.4M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 15, 2021 – Feb 10, 2026· N0016421F3023
  3. PROVIDE AN ENTERPRISE SOLUTION ENCOMPASSING A FULL RANGE OF ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PEO IWS 10.0 HIGHLY INTERRELATED PRODUCT LINES DEVELOPED FOR THE FUNCTIONAL AREAS OF SYSTEM ENGINEERING, SHIP INTEGRATION AND TEST AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SSDS INTEGRATED COMBAT SYSTEM (ICS). PROVIDE WARFARE SYSTEMS (WS) AND ICS ENGINEERING FOR CARRIERS AND LARGE DECK AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS AND PROVIDE SUPPORT TO THE WS ENGINEERING TECHNICAL TEAM (WSETT) AND OTHER PLATFORM RELATED IPTS.$60.8M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 2, 2017 – Dec 9, 2025· N0016417F3001
  4. ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR COMBATANT CRAFT DIVISION$54.6M
    Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Jul 10, 2020 – Dec 17, 2025· N0016720F3000
  5. THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PORT HUENEME DIVISION (NSWC PHD} IS THE DESIGNATED IN-SERVICE ENGINEERING AGENT (ISEA) FOR UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT(UNREP). THE UNREP DIVISION{S60)IS TASKED WITH PROVIDING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, IN- SERVICE ENGINEERING, LOGISTICS, AND LIFECYCLE SUPPORT FOR UNREP SYSTEMS.$52M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 23, 2017 – Mar 12, 2026· N6339417F3001
  6. THE REQUIREMENT IS FOR CNSP READINESS ASSISTANCE TRAINING TEAM (RATT) SUPPORT SERVICES.$37M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2021 – May 31, 2026· N0024421F3025
  7. NON-PERSONAL TECHNICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR CRADLE-TO-GRAVE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OF PEO IWS COMBAT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CMS).$12.8M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 6, 2022 – Jun 4, 2026· N0016422F3005
  8. ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE SUPPORT (EMS)$7.6M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Mar 29, 2023 – Jan 12, 2026· N0018923F0248

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $48.5K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. SPECTRO ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.$48.5K100%
    WILMINGTON, MA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $69.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. PRISM MARITIME, INC.$69.4K100%
    CHESAPEAKE, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.1% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2022: $71.4M paid out · $30.9M received
  • FY2023: $31.3M paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2024: $8.2M paid out · $123.6K received
  • FY2025: $533.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $48.5K paid out · $69.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

50 companies · $111.5M reported

  1. INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT CORP.$32.1M
    GREENBELT, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MUSTANG TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$18.3M
    FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SPECTRO ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.$10.6M
    WILMINGTON, MA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

27 companies · $128.7M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$62.1M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$15.4M
    SPARKS, NV · 2 subawards
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$11.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$367M−60% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C. (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AMERICAN PACIFIC CORP.AI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$280K
16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$850K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$280K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$270K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$280K
    16 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Environment and Superfund32 reports
  2. Defense10 reports
  3. Accounting1 reports
  4. Advertising1 reports
  5. Foreign relations1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)33 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE22 reports
  3. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES20 reports
  4. State - Dept of (DOS)15 reports
  5. Defense - Dept of (DOD)14 reports
  6. Executive Office of the President (EOP)14 reports
  7. Natl Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$710K
    12 reports
  2. Alcalde & Fay$140K
    14 reports
  3. Policy Navigation Group$0
    14 reports

4 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.