Federal contractor · RESTON, VA

KIHOMAC INC

KIHOMAC INC received $17.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 38 awards (−47% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $329.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$17.7M
New awards
38
Sole-source
54%
Single offer
2.0%
UEI
U61MKRKMVQN3
Parent company
KIHOMAC, INC.
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $17.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. KIHOMAC INCRESTON, VA · Family page
    $17.7M
  2. KIHOMAC, INC.LAYTON, UT
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 33.3MFY2017
  2. 28.1MFY2018
  3. 57.6MFY2019
  4. 45MFY2020
  5. 25.5MFY2021
  6. 23.4MFY2022
  7. 47MFY2023
  8. 18.9MFY2024
  9. 33.4MFY2025
  10. 17.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 17 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$10.7M61%
  2. Professional services$4.1M23%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$1.7M9.8%
  4. Equipment maintenance$1.2M6.5%
  5. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Peach County, GA$465.2K2.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition56%
    US 39% · $9.8M
  • Sole-source awards54%
    US 30% · $9.5M
  • Single-offer competitions2.0%
    US 8.7% · $352.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Davis County, UT· Professional services· Jul 31, 2019 – Dec 23, 2025· 47QFRA19F0022
  2. Department of the Navy· Davis County, UT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 19, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· N0042123F0951
  3. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jan 23, 2025 – Apr 2, 2026· N6833525C0136
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 22, 2021 – Feb 25, 2026· SPRWA121F0062
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Davis County, UT· IT & telecom· Sep 19, 2025 – Oct 21, 2025· SPRWA125F0033
  6. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 22, 2026 – May 19, 2026· N0042126F0408
  7. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· N0038326CFA11
  8. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 30, 2021 – May 21, 2026· N0042121F0037

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.1M (9 subawards)

6 sub-recipients

  1. UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORY$2.3M57%
    STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward
  2. STOW, OH · 3 subawards
  3. OGDEN, UT · 1 subaward
  4. EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 1 subaward
  5. HEXCEL CORP$101.8K2.5%
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 2 subawards
  6. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $28.4M (7 subawards)

5 primes

  1. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 3 subawards
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  4. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 23% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $6.7M paid out · $64.7M received
  • FY2022: $1.3M paid out · $691.2K received
  • FY2023: $4.5M paid out · $13.5M received
  • FY2024: $5.2M paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2025: $8.9M paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2026: $4.1M paid out · $28.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

81 companies · $30.6M reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. STOW, OH · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. COLUMBIA, TN · 11 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $121.7M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 6 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. YORK, PA · 35 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MARVIN ENGINEERING CO, INC$48.2M−12% in FY2026
    INGLEWOOD, CA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. D-J ENGINEERING INC$77.6M−49% in FY2026
    AUGUSTA, KS · 2 entities · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RHINESTAHL CORPORATION$39.6M−25% in FY2026
    MASON, OH · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of KIHOMAC INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • KIHOMACAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$180K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$30K
    3 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$30K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE8 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. KED STRATEGIES, LLC$180K
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.