Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

HEXCEL CORP

HEXCEL CORP received $165.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($166.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$165.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FFEEWA9Q4EB5
Parent company
HEXCEL CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ARC TECHNOLOGIES LLC company family: 6 registered entities, $1.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ARC TECHNOLOGIES LLCAMESBURY, MA · Family page
    $1M
  2. HEXCEL CORPSTAMFORD, CT
    $0
  3. HEXCEL CORPCASA GRANDE, AZ
    $0
  4. HEXCEL CORPORATIONWEST VALLEY CITY, UT
    $0
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2017
  2. 320KFY2018
  3. 193.1KFY2019
  4. 37.2KFY2020
  5. 465.9KFY2021
  6. 232.9KFY2022
  7. 431.4KFY2023
  8. 544.2KFY2024
  9. 264.5KFY2025
  10. 165.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$165.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$7,720
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$802
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$6,919
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 24, 2025· SPE1C126P0091
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 14, 2017 – Mar 11, 2026· SPE1C117P0685
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 22, 2024 – Mar 9, 2026· 80NSSC24PA925

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

HEXCEL CORP received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 3 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
3
Since FY2021
$1.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 16.4KFY2021
  2. 271.3KFY2022
  3. 1.2MFY2023
  4. 0FY2025
  5. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 43.002 · Aeronautics· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jul 27, 2022 – Mar 26, 2026· 80NSSC22M0200

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.4M (18 subawards)

6 primes

  1. AMARILLO, TX · 9 subawards
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards
  3. KIHOMAC INC$101.8K4.3%
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards
  4. FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards
  5. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $160.1M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 37 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 972 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. AMARILLO, TX · 77 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FARMINGDALE, NY · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing+2 more
  2. LINEAR PHOTONICS LLC$2.2M−94% in FY2026
    HAMILTON, NJ · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing+1 more
  3. BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS$6.5M−81% in FY2026
    SANTA ANA, CA · 2 entities · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ARC TECHNOLOGIES LLC (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HEXCEL CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$770K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.5M
$1.4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$17.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$190K
    5 reports
  2. 2024$210K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$770K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$300K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations19 reports
  2. Defense16 reports
  3. Trade (domestic and foreign)15 reports
  4. Aerospace13 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear5 reports
  6. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES21 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE21 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$280K
    6 reports
  2. PCH STRATEGIES, LLC$120K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$15K86%
  2. Democratic$2,50014%

PACs sponsored

  • HEXCEL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$25.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.