Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
KONIAG TECHNOLOGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, LLC
KONIAG TECHNOLOGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, LLC received $6.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+86% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $9.6M. Its largest customer was USTRANSCOM ($3.7M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $6.1M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- DULVYTU1M8K5
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the KONIAG TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC company family: 2 registered entities, $36.1M in FY2026 together. See the family
- KONIAG TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$29.9M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-09
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 235.8KFY2024
- 3.3MFY2025
- 6.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- USTRANSCOM$3.7M61%1 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$1.7M27%1 awards
- Department of the Army$470.2K7.7%3 awards
- Department of the Navy$194K3.2%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$71.4K1.2%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$5.7M92%
- Professional services$312.7K5.1%
- Health & medical$157.5K2.6%
Where the work was performed
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$3.9M63%
- Norfolk city, VA$1.7M27%
- Hancock County, MS$194K3.2%
- United States$157.8K2.6%
- Spokane County, WA$157.5K2.6%
- Greene County, OH$71.4K1.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $6.1M
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $6.1M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- USTRANSCOM$3.7MDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
- Department of the Army$470.2KDepartment of Defense · 3 awards
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- NOSS CSS$2.3MDepartment of the Navy· Cumberland County, PA· Professional services· Jul 17, 2025 – May 18, 2026· N0018925PR037
- Department of the Navy· Hancock County, MS· IT & telecom· Sep 16, 2025 – May 19, 2026· N0018925P0567
- Department of the Army· Spokane County, WA· Health & medical· Nov 19, 2025 – Mar 30, 2026· W50S9D26PA001
- Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Mar 23, 2026 – Mar 23, 2026· W50S7Z26PA003
- Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· IT & telecom· Apr 16, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· FA239626CB005
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $4.4M reported
- FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
- NORMAN, OK · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- FOCUSED MANAGEMENT, INC.$34.3M−16% in FY2026ALEXANDRIA, VA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
- VIATRIE LLC$36.6M−0.4% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING GROUP, LLC$40.9M+1,640% in FY2026MECHANICSBURG, PA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.