Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

KONIAG TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC

KONIAG TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC received $29.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+194% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $215.7M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($25.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$29.9M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.2%
UEI
T9KJJBXKHG61
Small businessNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $36.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. KONIAG TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $29.9M
  2. KONIAG TECHNOLOGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $6.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 33.4MFY2017
  2. 28.7MFY2018
  3. 36MFY2019
  4. 23.4MFY2020
  5. 9.7MFY2021
  6. 10.5MFY2022
  7. 15.9MFY2023
  8. 18MFY2024
  9. 10.2MFY2025
  10. 29.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Chief Financial Officer$25.2M84%
    2 awards
  2. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service$3.6M12%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$1.2M4.2%
    1 awards
  4. Federal Bureau of Investigation$14.4K0.0%
    4 awards
  5. Department of State-$76.9K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$28.8M96%
  2. Research & development$1.2M4.1%
  3. Professional services$23.3K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Anchorage Municipality, AK$26.7M89%
  2. Fairfax County, VA$1.8M6.1%
  3. Prince George's County, MD$1.2M4.2%
  4. Harrison County, WV$209.2K0.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.2%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions4.2%
    US 8.8% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ENTERPRISE NETWORK SERVICES CONSOLIDATION OF IT NETWORK AND NETWORK SUPPORT.$17.5M
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· May 8, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 12314426F0159
  2. SALESFORCE FEMA 109573 CPSXXX0000000245$14.6M
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Jan 22, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 12314425F0068
  3. AEP REGION 1 ONSITE SERVICES$2.6M
    Federal Bureau of Investigation· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Feb 19, 2026· 15F06724F0002172
  4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) SUPPORT FOR THE USDA AGRICULTURAL RISK MANAGEMENT (ARM) SYSTEM.$1.9M
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· 12639526F0367
  5. PROCUREMENT OF AGRICULTURAL RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ARMS) DEVELOPMENT, MODERNIZATION, AND ENHANCEMENTS (DME) SERVICES.$1.7M
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· 12639526F0532
  6. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND MACHINE LEARNING (ML) SOLUTION THAT PROACTIVELY IDENTIFIES INDIVIDUALS AT RISK OF ATTRITION AND RECOMMENDS TARGETED RETENTION STRATEGIES.$1.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Prince George's County, MD· Research & development· Mar 24, 2026 – Apr 9, 2026· FA701426C0017
  7. THE FBI'S TSC FACILITY SUPPORT UNIT (FSU) AND THE SECURITY UNIT REQUIRE CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PROVIDE CRITICAL EXPERT, RESPONSIVE, MANPOWER FOR THE TSC.$1.2M
    Federal Bureau of Investigation· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 14, 2023 – Jan 6, 2026· 15F06723F0000356
  8. FBI ACADEMY QUANTICO ESCORT SERVICES$1.2M
    Federal Bureau of Investigation· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 27, 2023 – Dec 1, 2025· 15F06723F0002258

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.4M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC.$3.4M100%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $4.4M reported

  1. DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC.$3.4M
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. CHICKASAW BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC$982.4K
    NORMAN, OK · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FOCUSED MANAGEMENT, INC.$34.3M−16% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. VIATRIE LLC$36.6M−0.4% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING GROUP, LLC$40.9M+1,640% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.