Federal contractor · EVERETT, WA

REID MIDDLETON, INC.

REID MIDDLETON, INC. received $4.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $98.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.1M
New awards
27
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
9.0%
UEI
JZ8XL55CBQL3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $4.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. REID MIDDLETON, INC.EVERETT, WA · Family page
    $4.1M
  2. REID MIDDLETON INCHONOLULU, HI
    $0
  3. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2017
  2. 6.3MFY2018
  3. 3.5MFY2019
  4. 11MFY2020
  5. 5.4MFY2021
  6. 15MFY2022
  7. 12MFY2023
  8. 22.4MFY2024
  9. 15.7MFY2025
  10. 4.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 15 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. U.S. Coast Guard-$35.4K0.0%
    6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$4.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$227.7K5.5%
  2. Yuba County, CA$201.9K4.9%
  3. King County, WA$5,0000.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.0%
    US 39% · $370.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions9.0%
    US 8.7% · $370.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Snohomish County, WA· Construction & real property· Jun 10, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· N4425524F4223
  2. Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2020 – Mar 19, 2026· FA468620F0134
  3. Department of the Navy· Snohomish County, WA· Construction & real property· Jul 23, 2025 – Feb 23, 2026· N4425525F0174
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Tillamook County, OR· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2023 – Jul 29, 2026· 70Z05023F43000016
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· Clatsop County, OR· Construction & real property· Apr 9, 2020 – May 11, 2026· 70Z05020FASTORA00
  6. Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 15, 2023 – Feb 9, 2026· N4425523F4497
  7. Department of State· Construction & real property· Sep 21, 2023 – Sep 11, 2026· 19AQMM23F3060
  8. Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2024 – Feb 5, 2026· N4425524F4418

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.2M (12 subawards)

10 sub-recipients

  1. WOOD HARBINGER INC$1.2M39%
    BELLEVUE, WA · 3 subawards
  2. P2S LP$1.1M33%
    LONG BEACH, CA · 1 subaward
  3. BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES$405.7K13%
    MARYSVILLE, WA · 1 subaward
  4. KPFF INC$97.8K3.1%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  5. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  6. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward
  7. MISTRAS GROUP, INC.$69.2K2.2%
    BURLINGTON, WA · 1 subaward
  8. HL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC.$59.3K1.9%
    ORANGE, CA · 1 subaward
  9. CUMMING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC$44.1K1.4%
    WESTPORT, CT · 1 subaward
  10. SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $425.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MONTGOMERY, AL · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 77% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.9M paid out · $118.2K received
  • FY2022: $4.7M paid out · $2M received
  • FY2023: $5.1M paid out · $235.1K received
  • FY2024: $6.1M paid out · $552.8K received
  • FY2025: $2.5M paid out · $86.9K received
  • FY2026: $3.2M paid out · $425.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

45 companies · $24.6M reported

  1. SEATTLE, WA · 30 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. P2S LP$2.4M
    LONG BEACH, CA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $3.5M reported

  1. PASADENA, CA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MONTGOMERY, AL · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MBF ARCHITECTS, P.A.$41M−94% in FY2026
    NEW BERN, NC · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LTM INC$41.1M−80% in FY2026
    HAVELOCK, NC · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AI SIGNAL RESEARCH INC$37.3M+18% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.