Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

KULR TECHNOLOGY CORP

No contract obligations recorded for KULR TECHNOLOGY CORP in FY2026. Since FY2017: $1.8M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YM83B3CN2K61
Parent company
KULR TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 22KFY2017
  2. 24.5KFY2018
  3. 75.7KFY2019
  4. 65.9KFY2020
  5. 803.1KFY2021
  6. 24.4KFY2022
  7. 609KFY2023
  8. 97.5KFY2024
  9. 117.3KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. 21700 P50B TRIGGER CELLS WITH INTERNAL SHORT CIRCUIT DEVICES$117.3K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· Apr 29, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· 80NSSC25PA978

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

KULR TECHNOLOGY CORP received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $93.6K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $499.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $246K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $1.9M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$687.2K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$678K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards
  3. GENERAL TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$246K
    WALL TOWNSHIP, NJ · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INTEGRATED HOLDINGS, INC.$211.4K−100% in FY2026
    ROMEO, MI · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. MIRO ANALYTICAL AG$219.1K−100% in FY2026
    WALLISELLEN, CHE · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. KALEVA DESIGN INC$232K
    SAN LEANDRO, CA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • KULR Technology GroupAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$20K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$20K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$20K
    4 reports
  2. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Telecommunications6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE6 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Broydrick & Associates$20K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.