Federal contractor · HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA

LANIC AEROSPACE LLC

LANIC AEROSPACE LLC received $988.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards. Since FY2017: $2.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($988.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$988.8K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PVUSNPDQCYB7
Parent company
LANIC ENGINEERING INC
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $988.8K in FY2026 together.

  1. LANIC AEROSPACE LLCHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · Family page
    $988.8K
  2. LANIC ENGINEERING INCRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 613KFY2017
  2. 0FY2018
  3. 403.6KFY2019
  4. 303.8KFY2020
  5. 103KFY2021
  6. 119.6KFY2022
  7. 143.3KFY2023
  8. 83.4KFY2024
  9. 0FY2025
  10. 988.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$988.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Orange County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· SPEHA626C0002
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Orange County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 14, 2025 – Nov 14, 2025· SPE4A726F1335
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Orange County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 14, 2025 – Nov 14, 2025· SPE4A726P2497

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $8.8M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 80 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 24 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARA, INC$1.2M−69% in FY2026
    SAN DIMAS, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. WK ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.$977.8K−100% in FY2026
    SANTA CLARITA, CA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. KASTALON INC$1.2M−74% in FY2026
    ALSIP, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.