Federal contractor · STAFFORD, TX

LASER SHOT, INC.

LASER SHOT, INC. received $21.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+278% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $54.8M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($17.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$21.3M
New awards
7
Sole-source
16%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G62XKQN4A4Q4
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.4MFY2017
  2. 2.9MFY2018
  3. 3.5MFY2019
  4. 2.9MFY2020
  5. 3.1MFY2021
  6. 3.9MFY2022
  7. 3.8MFY2023
  8. 5.4MFY2024
  9. 5.6MFY2025
  10. 21.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection$17.7M83%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$2.2M10%
    3 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$1.2M5.6%
    1 awards
  4. Department of State$194.5K0.9%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$19.1M90%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.2M10%

Where the work was performed

  1. Webb County, TX$17.7M83%
  2. Cumberland County, NC$2.2M10%
  3. Bexar County, TX$1.2M5.6%
  4. Fort Bend County, TX$194.5K0.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition16%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards16%
    US 30% · $3.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$2.2M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$1.2M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, DELIVER, INSTALL, AND COMMISSION TWO (2) MODULAR FIRING RANGES AT THE JMSC LAREDO SITE, TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED OFF-THE-SHELF TRAINING DEVICES AND TRAINING MATERIALS, INCLUDING FIVE CLASSROOMS AND SIX STORAGE ANNEXES.$17.7M
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Webb County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 70B01C26F00001024
  2. LASER SHOT SIMULATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES$11M
    Department of the Navy· Fort Bend County, TX· Professional services· Jul 6, 2022 – May 7, 2026· N0018922F1332
  3. MOBILE MARKSMANSHIP TRAINER AND ASSOCIATED WEAPONS AND ACCESSORIES, NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING AND CLS.$2.3M
    Department of the Army· Fort Bend County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 16, 2021 – Nov 17, 2025· W900KK22C0006
  4. THE UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE COMMAND (USARC) HAS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE REFIT AND A FIVE-YEAR WARRANTY OF (8) MOBILE MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING SIMULATORS (MMTS) AND (2) WARRIOR SKILLS TRAINERS (WST) WEAPONS SIMULATORS.$2.2M
    Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· W9124726PA004
  5. M4 TRAINER WEAPONS$1.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· FA301626P0038
  6. MOBILE MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING SYSTEMS$843.4K
    Department of the Army· Fort Bend County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 27, 2023 – Apr 9, 2026· W900KK24C0003
  7. 37/ESCIG/MARKSMANSHIP-SHOOTING TRAINING SIMULATOR/0926$194.5K
    Department of State· Fort Bend County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 20, 2026 – Aug 20, 2026· 19C01526P0112

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $372.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $720.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $8.9M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$6M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$1.1M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$554.3K
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 2 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 17 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GENASYS INC.$2.9M−90% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 6.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Audio and video equipment manufacturing
  2. ENERGIZER, LLC$8.5M−84% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2 entities · 7.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing
  3. FDH DEFENSE AFTERMARKET, LLC$15.3M−24% in FY2026
    COMMERCE, CA · 8.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingArmy · Other miscellaneous manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Laser Shot Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$15K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2025
$55K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$40K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$15K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations5 reports
  2. Defense5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. THE VOGEL GROUP$55K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.