Federal contractor · GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
MERRICK & COMPANY
MERRICK & COMPANY received $46M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $268.5M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($33.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $46M
- New awards
- 25
- Sole-source
- 82%
- Single offer
- 5.4%
- UEI
- MSCKD57619M7
- Parent company
- MERRICK & COMPANY
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $46M in FY2026 together.
- MERRICK & COMPANYGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · Family page$46M
- MERRICK-ATKINS JOINT VENTURE, LLPGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO$0
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 22.1MFY2017
- 22.5MFY2018
- 13.2MFY2019
- 22.1MFY2020
- 15.3MFY2021
- 21.3MFY2022
- 21.6MFY2023
- 30.7MFY2024
- 53.6MFY2025
- 46MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Agricultural Research Service$33.8M73%2 awards
- Office of Procurement Operations$6.3M14%1 awards
- 3 awards
- Department of the Air Force$1.7M3.6%9 awards
- 4 awards
- U.S. Geological Survey$12K0.0%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
- Department of the Army-$3020.0%4 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$44M96%
- Construction & real property$2M4.4%
- IT & telecom$12K0.0%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Pottawatomie County, KS$20.1M44%
- Riley County, KS$13.6M30%
- Suffolk County, NY$10.2M22%
- Arapahoe County, CO$2.2M4.7%
- El Paso County, CO$162.4K0.4%
- DeKalb County, GA$105.1K0.2%
- 72$27.7K0.1%
- Phelps County, MO$12K0.0%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition87%US 39% · $40.2M
- Sole-source awards82%US 30% · $37.7M
- Single-offer competitions5.4%US 8.7% · $2.5M
- Urgency justifications73%US 5.1% · $33.8M
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
- Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Agricultural Research Service· Riley County, KS· Professional services· Aug 29, 2025 – Sep 25, 2026· 1232SA25C0028
- NBAF - BAS SUPPORT$20.1MAgricultural Research Service· Pottawatomie County, KS· Professional services· Feb 20, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 1232SA26C0001
- Office of Procurement Operations· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Jan 8, 2024 – Jul 20, 2026· 70RSAT24C00000001
- Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Jul 3, 2025 – Jun 17, 2026· 12639525F0772
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration· DeKalb County, GA· Construction & real property· Mar 16, 2022 – Sep 3, 2026· 80KSC022FA025
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Brevard County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· 80KSC024FA040
- Department of the Air Force· Arapahoe County, CO· Construction & real property· Mar 31, 2026 – Apr 24, 2026· FA254326F0002
- Department of the Air Force· Arapahoe County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – May 22, 2026· FA254325F0031
Federal grants & assistance received
Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.
MERRICK & COMPANY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).
- Assistance · FY2026
- $0
- New awards
- 0
- Actions
- 0
- Since FY2021
- $231K
Assistance by fiscal year
- 49.7KFY2021
- 100KFY2022
- 99.7KFY2023
- -18.4KFY2024
- 0FY2025
Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.1M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $69.8M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $4.3M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $277.5K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
11 companies · $84.1M reported
- COLUMBUS, OH · 9 subawards · Facilities support services
- NOBLIS, INC.$8.1MRESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- FREDERICK, MD · 40 subawards · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED$42.5M−30% in FY2026NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ACUITY - PT&C, LLC$35.1M−39% in FY2026ATLANTA, GA · 2 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TECNICA Y PROYECTOS TYPSA FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES$41M−96% in FY2026RIYADH, SAU · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.