Federal contractor · SCHAUMBURG, IL

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC received -$2,827 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−104% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $753.4K. Its largest customer was U.S. Marshals Service (-$2,827).

Obligations · FY2026
-$2,827
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
HLLPW1Z5UBT3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14KFY2020
  2. -14KFY2021
  3. 619.1KFY2022
  4. 0FY2023
  5. 64.2KFY2024
  6. 72.9KFY2025
  7. -2.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Marshals Service-$2,8270.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. GLRFTF MOTOROLA RADIO SERVICE FY24 POP: 10/1/23 - 9/30/24 *SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS*$42.3K
    U.S. Marshals Service· Cook County, IL· Professional services· Sep 26, 2023 – Sep 22, 2026· 15M10323PA4700196

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $1.2M reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$1.2M
    GREENVILLE, TX · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FERBAK, INC.$7.6M−65% in FY2026
    NORTHRIDGE, CA · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Communications equipment manufacturingU.S. Marshals Service · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. INVISIO COMMUNICATIONS INC$19.8M−44% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Communications equipment manufacturingU.S. Marshals Service · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. DANA SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.$26.8M+241% in FY2026
    GREENSBORO, NC · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Marshals Service · Communications equipment manufacturingFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Communications equipment manufacturingState · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 8 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.AI match · 100%
  • MotorolaAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.9M
30 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$6.8M
$6.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$352.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.8M
    23 reports
  2. 2024$2M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$1.9M
    30 reports
  4. 2026$1.1M
    18 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations53 reports
  2. Telecommunications34 reports
  3. Defense22 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code18 reports
  5. Civil rights and civil liberties14 reports
  6. Consumer issues, safety and products14 reports
  7. Aviation, aircraft and airlines4 reports
  8. Copyright, patent and trademark4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES75 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE69 reports
  3. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)6 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)5 reports
  5. Natl Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA)3 reports
  6. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)3 reports
  7. Natl Economic Council (NEC)2 reports
  8. White House Office2 reports
  9. Defense Security Services1 reports
  10. Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. POLARIS GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC$820K
    14 reports
  2. SALT POINT STRATEGIES$810K
    14 reports
  3. Forza DC, LLC$700K
    14 reports
  4. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$320K
    6 reports
  5. GALVANIZE PARTNERS LLC$225K
    5 reports
  6. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$70K
    2 reports
  7. COURSON NICKEL LLC$0
    14 reports
  8. Grant Consulting Group$0
    10 reports

9 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$289K82%
  2. Democratic$63.5K18%

PACs sponsored

  • MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$925.7K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.