Federal contractor · HAMPTON, VA

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ASSOCIATES received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−5.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $36.2M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($1.1M). It also received $937.5K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
SLMPURD4W9U9
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.7MFY2017
  2. 7.2MFY2018
  3. 3.3MFY2019
  4. 5.3MFY2020
  5. 7.6MFY2021
  6. 3.4MFY2022
  7. 1.7MFY2023
  8. -130.1KFY2024
  9. 1.2MFY2025
  10. 1.1MFY2026
  11. -25.9KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$120.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$120.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CONTINUATION OF FAR TERM TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD TO SUPPORT THE AATT PROJECT. THE ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY (AATT) PROJECT S OVERARCHING GOAL IS TO EXPLORE AND DEVELOP TECHNOLOGIES AND CONCEPTS TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY, AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FIXED WING TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT. TO IDENTIFY TECHNOLOGY AND VEHICLE SOLUTIONS THAT MEET THE PROJECT S GOALS REQUIRES THE USE OF SYSTEM-LEVEL ANALYSIS WITH THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF FIDELITY TO QUANTIFY FEASIBILITY, INTERDEPENDENCIES BETWEEN TECHNOLOGIES, BENEFITS, AND DEGRADATIONS. PRIOR WORK HAS RESULTED IN A DASHBOARD CAPABILITY THAT ESTIMATES THE BENEFITS OF AATT TECHNOLOGIES ON CONVENTIONAL TUBE AND WING CONFIGURATIONS. THIS PROVIDES THE AATT PROJECT AN ABILITY TO EXAMINE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS AND TRADEOFFS USING AN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT THAT ENABLES USER DEFINED TECHNOLOGY SCENARIOS TO BE SELECTED WITH RAPID ESTIMATES OF BENEFITS AGAINST METRICS OF INTEREST SUCH AS FUEL CONSUMPTION, NOISE, AND EMISSIONS. HOWEVER, THERE IS A NEED TO EXTEND THIS CAPABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF UNCONVENTIONAL CONFIGURATIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS HYBRID-ELECTRIC PROPULSION. THERE IS ALSO A NEED TO UPDATE THE BASELINES USED TO DETERMINE TECHNOLOGY BENEFITS TO BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE OF NEW IN-SERVICE AIRCRAFT. THE MAJOR OBJECTIVE FOR THE PROPOSED RESEARCH IS TO ENHANCE THE AATT TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD BY UPDATING BASELINE REFERENCE VEHICLES AND INCORPORATING THE EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGIES ON UNCONVENTIONAL CONFIGURATIONS. IN ADDITION, PREVIOUSLY COMPILED INFORMATION ON AATT TECHNOLOGIES WILL BE UPDATED AS NEEDED TO ENSURE THE COMPLETE TECHNOLOGY DATABASE IS CURRENT. STUDIES AND DATA RESULTING FROM NASA CONTRACT NNL13AA08B TASK ORDER NNL17AA71T SHALL BE THE INITIAL STARTING POINT FOR THIS TASK.$1.4M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Research & development· Jul 17, 2018 – Aug 4, 2026· 80LARC18F0149
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Professional services· Jul 21, 2025 – Aug 5, 2026· 80JSC025F0030
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Professional services· Jul 24, 2025 – Jul 8, 2026· 80JSC025F0034
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Professional services· Sep 2, 2025 – Jun 16, 2026· 80JSC025F0048
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Research & development· Mar 8, 2018 – Jun 5, 2026· 80LARC18F0061
  6. MODEL-BASED AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION. MODERN AIRCRAFT ARE COMPLEX MACHINES WITH NUMEROUS INTERACTING SYSTEMS THAT ARE USED TO TRANSPORT GOODS OR PASSENGERS OVER GREAT DISTANCES AT HIGH SPEEDS. IMPROPER DESIGN OR OPERATION OF AN AIRCRAFT MAY POSE A SAFETY RISK TO CREW AND PASSENGERS ONBOARD THE MACHINE, AS WELL AS PEOPLE AND PROPERTY NEAR THE AIRCRAFT OPERATION. GIVEN THESE POTENTIAL RISKS, MOST AIRCRAFT ARE SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENT-MANDATED SAFETY RULES THAT APPLY TO THE AIRWORTHINESS OF THE DESIGN, THE PRODUCTION PROCESSES USED TO MAKE THESE MACHINES, AND THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF INDIVIDUAL AIRCRAFT. CERTIFICATION REFERS TO SOME ACCEPTED FORM OF PROOF THAT THESE RULES HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED. MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (MBSE) IS AN EMERGING DISCIPLINE THAT LEVERAGES MODELS, RATHER THAN DOCUMENTS, FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EXERCISES. THIS INCLUDES DEVELOPING MODELS THAT REPRESENT REQUIREMENTS, AND LINKING THESE MODELS TO OTHER MODELS OF VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. DEFINING REQUIREMENTS AND ASSOCIATED VERIFICATIONS IN MODELS, RATHER THAN DOCUMENTS, OPENS UP A VARIETY OF NEW DATABASE-DRIVEN APPROACHES TO STREAMLINE GENERATION OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING WORKFLOWS. AT ITS CORE, AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION IS A PRESCRIBED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS IDENTIFICATION OF CORE REQUIREMENTS, SELECTION OF MEANS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE, AND GENERATION OF EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT FOR VERIFICATION. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO DEMONSTRATE HOW MBSE TECHNIQUES CAN BE LEVERAGED TO GENERATE SPECIFIC AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND VERIFICATION EVIDENCE (MEANS OF COMPLIANCE).$434.9K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Research & development· Apr 26, 2019 – Jun 5, 2026· 80LARC19F0057
  7. ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF ON DEMAND AIR MOBILITY: VERTIPORTS, AIRSPACE AND CONCEPTS. THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE (NIA), WORKING WITH THE MIT INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION (ICAT), CONDUCTED PART I OF THE OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF ON-DEMAND AIR MOBILITY STUDY FROM FEBRUARY 2016 THROUGH JULY 2017. THIS FIRST PART OF THE PROJECT COMPLETED A CASE STUDY IN LOS ANGELES TO IDENTIFY KEY SYSTEM-LEVEL CONSTRAINTS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ON DEMAND MOBILITY (ODM) AVIATION SERVICES IN THE CONTEXT OF URBAN AIR MOBILITY (UAM). PART II OF THE STUDY, TITLED FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF ON-DEMAND MOBILITY, WAS CONDUCTED FROM JULY 2017 TO JANUARY 2019. PART II EXPANDED THE CASE STUDY METHODOLOGY DEVELOPED IN PART I TO TWO ADDITIONAL CITIES, PRIORITIZED AND CHARACTERIZED THE SEVERITY OF THE IDENTIFIED OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS, AND DEVELOPED INITIAL MODELING TECHNIQUES FOR VERTIPORT OPERATIONS AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. THIS WORK WAS PERFORMED UNDER NASA/NIA CONTRACT NO: NNL13AA08B; TASK ORDER NO: 80LARC17F0074. THE INTENT OF THIS NEW TASK IS TO BUILD UPON THE FINDINGS AND OUTPUTS OF THE PART I AND II EFFORTS THROUGH A FOLLOW-ON STUDY. A PRIMARY GOAL OF THIS FOLLOW-ON WORK IS TO REFINE AND MATURE THE MODELS, TOOLS AND ANALYSIS METHODS DEVELOPED IN THE PREVIOUS PARTS OF THE PROJECT INTO A DOCUMENTED DELIVERABLE THAT CAN INFORM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NASA AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT-EXPLORATION (ATM-X) TESTBED FOR USE IN SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS AND STUDIES. FURTHERMORE, WHERE REQUESTED BY NASA, IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF UAM CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS (CONOPS) AND TECHNOLOGY ROAD MAPPING THROUGH RESEARCH BRIEFS, TELECONFERENCES, AND PARTICIPATION IN MEETINGS. THE CONTRACTOR WILL INTERFACE WITH OTHER RESEARCH PROGRAMS, SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS, AND CONSULTANTS AS NECESSARY, FOR RESEARCH INTO SPECIFIC TOPICS THAT MAY ARISE.$415K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Research & development· Jun 12, 2019 – Aug 4, 2026· 80LARC19F0068
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Research & development· Mar 16, 2020 – Jun 5, 2026· 80LARC20F0035

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ASSOCIATES received $937.5K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 20 actions (2 new awards), −77% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 43.001 · Science ($577.2K).

Assistance · FY2026
$937.5K
New awards
2
Actions
20
Since FY2021
$51.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 19.5MFY2021
  2. 16.1MFY2022
  3. 7.7MFY2023
  4. 3.5MFY2024
  5. 4MFY2025
  6. 937.5KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$937.5K100%

Top programs

  1. 43.001 · Science$577.2K62%
  2. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research$282.8K30%
  3. 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM)$77.6K8.3%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 43.008 · Office of Stem Engagement (OSTEM)· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Aug 20, 2021 – Jun 18, 2026· NNL09AA00A
  2. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Oct 9, 2020 – Aug 4, 2026· 80LARC17C0004
  3. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Project grant· Dec 9, 2020 – Aug 3, 2026· NNX16AB91A
  4. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research· Department of the Navy· Project grant· Apr 11, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· N000142312456
  5. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Project grant· Jun 23, 2023 – Jun 8, 2026· 80NSSC23K1052
  6. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Project grant· Aug 13, 2025 – Aug 27, 2026· 80NSSC25K0043

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $383.4K (12 subawards)

6 sub-recipients

  1. COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards
  2. ALBANY, NY · 2 subawards
  3. RALEIGH, NC · 2 subawards
  4. TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING CONSORTIUM, INC.$36.2K9.4%
    STUART, FL · 1 subaward
  5. WAVERLEIGH CREATIVE, LLC$2,7200.7%
    NORFOLK, VA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $143.7K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $5.7M paid out · $140K received
  • FY2022: $2.9M paid out · $70K received
  • FY2023: $923K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $725.7K paid out · $829.8K received
  • FY2025: $201K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $383.4K paid out · $143.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

26 companies · $10.8M reported

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 12 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SCHLICKENMAIER. HERBERT$480.6K
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BLACKSBURG, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.2M reported

  1. LAUREL, MD · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards
  3. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DAVIDSON, NC · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. TECHPIPELINE INC.$1.9M+14% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. DENVER, CO · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.