Federal contractor · ROME, NY

NORTH POINT DEFENSE INC

NORTH POINT DEFENSE INC received $710K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−94% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $134.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($710K).

Obligations · FY2026
$710K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G3MPMA2NZ9G9
Parent company
NORTH POINT DEFENSE INC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.6MFY2017
  2. 11.3MFY2018
  3. 8.1MFY2019
  4. 21.1MFY2020
  5. 20.8MFY2021
  6. 13.6MFY2022
  7. 6.4MFY2023
  8. 28.3MFY2024
  9. 11.8MFY2025
  10. 710KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$710K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Oneida County, NY· Research & development· Sep 16, 2022 – Mar 12, 2026· FA875022C1522
  2. Department of the Air Force· Oneida County, NY· Research & development· Sep 25, 2023 – Apr 30, 2026· FA875023C1512

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $643.1K (8 subawards)

4 sub-recipients

  1. APRS WORLD LLC$259.2K40%
    LEWISTON, MN · 3 subawards
  2. SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards
  4. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8.4M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. PERATON INC.$8.4M100%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 91% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $525.3K paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2022: $1.2M paid out · $687.4K received
  • FY2023: $427.4K paid out · $400K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2025: $950.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $643.1K paid out · $8.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

11 companies · $3.7M reported

  1. MINNESOTA CITY, MN · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. UTICA, NY · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $15.6M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. IDAHO SCIENTIFIC LLC$32.4M−66% in FY2026
    BOISE, ID · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. GENEVA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$33.1M+65% in FY2026
    MONUMENT, CO · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.