Federal contractor · EL SEGUNDO, CA

VARDA SPACE INDUSTRIES, INC.

VARDA SPACE INDUSTRIES, INC. received $12.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−29% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $48.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($12.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12.6M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
37%
UEI
J3R2KNLS7GE4
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 443.5KFY2021
  2. 46.4KFY2022
  3. 9MFY2023
  4. 8.6MFY2024
  5. 17.8MFY2025
  6. 12.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$7.9M63%
  2. Research & development$4.7M37%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition37%
    US 39% · $4.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions37%
    US 8.7% · $4.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· May 12, 2023 – Jan 8, 2026· FA945323CA035
  2. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Dec 30, 2024 – May 28, 2026· FA945325FX010
  3. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Jan 28, 2026 – Jan 28, 2026· FA945326FX010
  4. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Nov 26, 2025 – Mar 21, 2026· FA945326FX002
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Transportation & logistics· Mar 15, 2024 – Dec 1, 2025· 80AFRC24FA018
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF090

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DEFENSE ENGINEERING CORP$36.7M−18% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. SPARC RESEARCH LLC$39.3M−95% in FY2026
    WARRENTON, VA · 2 entities · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. GENEVA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$33.1M+65% in FY2026
    MONUMENT, CO · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • VARDA SPACE INDUSTRIES INC.AI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$500K
14 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.5M
$1.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$50.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$350K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$410K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$500K
    14 reports
  4. 2026$280K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense27 reports
  2. Aerospace25 reports
  3. Science and technology11 reports
  4. Trade (domestic and foreign)5 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES37 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE37 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$270K
    14 reports
  2. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$200K
    8 reports
  3. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$160K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$33.5K66%
  2. Democratic$17K34%

PACs sponsored

  • VARDA SPACE INDUSTRIES INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (VARDA PAC)$65.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.