Federal contractor · KAPOLEI, HI

NORTH STAR SCIENTIFIC CORP

NORTH STAR SCIENTIFIC CORP received -$132.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−101% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $142.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Contract Management Agency ($0).

Obligations · FY2026: -$132.6K
New awards: 11
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: RFEWEFJB9U76

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

365.6KFY2017
14.6MFY2018
3MFY2019
26.1MFY2020
9.7MFY2021
26.4MFY2022
19.8MFY2023
27.6MFY2024
14.9MFY2025
-132.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Defense Contract Management Agency$00.0%
2 awards
Department of the Navy-$132.6K0.0%
9 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Research & development$373.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Navy-$506.1K
Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

SBIR PHASE III R&D$14.4M
Defense Contract Management Agency· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Jul 14, 2022 – May 8, 2026· N6833522F0001
SBIR PHASE III R&D$13.7M
Defense Contract Management Agency· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Jun 12, 2025 – May 12, 2026· N0001925F0217
THE APPROACH IMPLEMENTS AN ACTIVE APERTURE ARRAY METHODOLOGY BY LEVERAGING ADVANCES IN ELECTRONICS, BEAMFORMING AND GAN SEMICONDUCTORS DEVELOPED UNDER NSS PHASE III SBIR. THESE DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE TAILORED TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM ON THE E-2D. WE W$10.8M
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· May 13, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· N0001424C1106
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$2.4M
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Aug 26, 2022 – May 6, 2026· N6833522C0182
SBIR PHASE III R&D$2.1M
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Mar 3, 2022 – Apr 21, 2026· N6833522F0019
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$1.5M
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Jul 21, 2022 – Dec 15, 2025· N6833522C0246
AMPLIFIER$338.1K
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· N0038326CNA06
AMPLIFIER$97K
Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 12, 2024 – Jan 7, 2026· N0038324CN040

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $8.7M (1 subaward)

1 prime

L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$8.7M100%
SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $33.6K received
FY2023: $0 paid out · $23M received
FY2024: $0 paid out · $25.5M received
FY2025: $0 paid out · $468.1K received
FY2026: $0 paid out · $8.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $60.1M reported

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$59.7M
GREENVILLE, TX · 17 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$302.7K
MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
VIASAT INC$94.6K
CARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

SEALANDAIRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$30.9M−18% in FY2026
JACKSON, MI · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
ATTALON, INC.$32.3M−100% in FY2026
MURRIETA, CA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC$46.7M−68% in FY2026
HONOLULU, HI · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

North Star Scientific CorporationAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $280K; 8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $900K

Lobbying by year

2023$200K
8 reports
2024$250K
8 reports
2025$280K
8 reports
2026$170K
5 reports

Top issues

Budget and appropriations29 reports
Defense16 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Strategies 360$420K
12 reports
Red Maple Consulting, LLC$400K
15 reports
THE WAYFINDER GROUP$80K
2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 9495 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20271 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026

1 of 29 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.