Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

OSI VISION LLC

OSI VISION LLC received $15.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $120M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($6.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.7M
New awards
16
Sole-source
30%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K9MCL74ARMP3
Parent company
OSI VISION LLC
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 7.8MFY2018
  3. 8.4MFY2019
  4. 8MFY2020
  5. 9.9MFY2021
  6. 15.4MFY2022
  7. 11.3MFY2023
  8. 21.1MFY2024
  9. 17.6MFY2025
  10. 15.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$6.8M44%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$6.7M42%
    11 awards
  3. Department of the Army$2.2M14%
    2 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Navy-$35.2K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$6.8M44%
  2. Professional services$6.5M41%
  3. Facilities & utilities$1.9M12%
  4. IT & telecom$447.2K2.8%
  5. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Brevard County, FL$6.8M44%
  2. Bexar County, TX$4.2M27%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$2.5M16%
  4. Pulaski County, AR$1.7M11%
  5. Newport News city, VA$482.4K3.1%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition30%
    US 39% · $4.6M
  • Sole-source awards30%
    US 30% · $4.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$4.2M
    Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. TECHNICAL WORKFORCE EDUCATION AND EXPERTISE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (TWEEDS) IN SUPPORT OF THE APPEL KS PROGRAM$22.9M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Brevard County, FL· Education & social services· Jun 2, 2023 – Sep 21, 2026· 80GRC023CA017
  2. NAVAL COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL SYSTEMS (NCMS) REQUIRES SECRET INTERNET PROTOCOL NETWORK (SIPRNET) PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) AND KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) SUPPORT SERVICES.$11.6M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2020 – Feb 25, 2026· N0018920F3026
  3. PHK-WILSON-SISTARE EXAMINING ACTIVITIES (NON-PERSONAL RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES)$11.1M
    Department of the Air Force· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 13, 2022 – May 7, 2026· FA701422F0077
  4. MGIB SUPPORT SERVICES (BASE)$4.9M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, AR· Professional services· Aug 26, 2024 – Jun 4, 2026· W9133L24F3014
  5. CRYPTO MODERNIZATION TECHNICAL LIAISON ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES$4.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Sep 21, 2023 – Apr 20, 2026· FA830723CB028
  6. FCC TASK MANAGEMENT LABOR$4.1M
    Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 15, 2021 – Mar 5, 2026· W911S022P0003
  7. LOGISTICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES$2.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Mar 17, 2022 – Apr 23, 2026· FA830722C0005
  8. ANIMAL CARE AND HOUSEKEEPING AT JBSA LACKLAND AFB, TX; REPLACING FA3016-20-C-0002 (OSI VISION LLC), UNDER 8A PROGRAM.$1.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2024 – Dec 19, 2025· FA301625C0005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $990.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $15.2M reported

  1. X TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$8.6M
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. STS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC$5.2M
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 3 subawards · Specialized design services
  3. VISTA DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$801.2K
    ROCK ISLAND, IL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYMOND POND FULL SERVICE SOLUTIONS JV LLC$26.8M+8.6% in FY2026
    CONYERS, GA · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GMHILL BAKER JV, LLC$12.7M−88% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. OTIE-MERRICK JV LLC$12.1M+64% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.