Federal contractor · PALO ALTO, CA

PALANTIR USG INC

PALANTIR USG INC received $1.3B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 54 awards (+71% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.8B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($959.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3B
New awards
54
Sole-source
88%
Single offer
3.4%
UEI
HNN4F9JZWDY8
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.7B in FY2026 together.

  1. PALANTIR USG INCPALO ALTO, CA · Family page
    $1.3B
  2. $465.8M
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3KFY2017
  2. 500FY2018
  3. 52.9MFY2020
  4. 67.6MFY2021
  5. 197.5MFY2022
  6. 150.6MFY2023
  7. 287.8MFY2024
  8. 744.5MFY2025
  9. 1.3BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 33 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 9 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.2B97%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$19.7M1.6%
  3. Research & development$12.6M1.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$3.9M0.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $1.2B
  • Sole-source awards88%
    US 30% · $1.1B
  • Single-offer competitions3.4%
    US 8.7% · $43.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 25 awards
  2. Department of State · 4 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Nov 21, 2025 – May 7, 2026· W9128Z26FA001
  2. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 11, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· W519TC26F0012
  3. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2025 – May 22, 2026· W519TC25F0331
  4. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· May 15, 2025 – May 28, 2026· FA880625FB009
  5. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 13, 2024 – Jan 16, 2026· W519TC25C0008
  6. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 13, 2025 – May 18, 2026· FA880625FB011
  7. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jan 30, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· N0018926FZ079
  8. Department of the Air Force· Honolulu County, HI· IT & telecom· Jul 16, 2025 – May 15, 2026· FA714625C0037

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $303K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $574.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $19.4M received
  • FY2025: $45.6K paid out · $29.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $303K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $45.6K reported

  1. ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 1 subaward · Software publishers

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $76.1M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 8 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 43 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. INTREPID LLC$455M−97% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP$5.5B+8.5% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Software publishersArmy · Software publishers+6 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PALANTIR USG INC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.AI match · 100%
  • PalantirAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$6.1M
36 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$21M
$21M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$49.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$5.1M
    26 reports
  2. 2024$5.8M
    30 reports
  3. 2025$6.1M
    36 reports
  4. 2026$4.1M
    24 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense87 reports
  2. Science and technology42 reports
  3. Aviation, aircraft and airlines27 reports
  4. Health issues23 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations13 reports
  6. Aerospace11 reports
  7. Intelligence and surveillance11 reports
  8. Government issues10 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES98 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE96 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Invariant LLC$2.2M
    14 reports
  2. Miller Strategies, LLC$1.1M
    7 reports
  3. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$1.1M
    11 reports
  4. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$1.1M
    11 reports
  5. BALLARD PARTNERS$960K
    6 reports
  6. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$665K
    14 reports
  7. Penn Avenue Partners$500K
    14 reports
  8. ANCHOR & ARROW STRATEGIES$230K
    8 reports

16 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$40K81%
  2. Democratic$9,50019%

PACs sponsored

  • EMPLOYEES OF PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. PAC$94.1K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.