Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL
JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC
JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLC received $50.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 63 awards (−79% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($50.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $50.9M
- New awards
- 63
- Sole-source
- 41%
- Single offer
- 9.9%
- UEI
- LFD2YFMZJ1J3
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $73.9M in FY2026 together.
- JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLCHUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page$50.9M
- JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, LLCROCKVILLE, MD$23M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 115.2MFY2017
- 109.8MFY2018
- 107.5MFY2019
- 96.5MFY2020
- 111.1MFY2021
- 164.4MFY2022
- 147.6MFY2023
- 203.1MFY2024
- 244.6MFY2025
- 50.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$50.5M99%59 awards
- Department of the Navy$295.8K0.6%2 awards
- Department of State$66K0.1%1 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$49.3M97%
- Construction & real property$1.6M3.1%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$23.1M45%
- Harford County, MD$5M9.8%
- Arlington County, VA$4.2M8.3%
- Honolulu County, HI$3.6M7.0%
- Anne Arundel County, MD$2.8M5.6%
- Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK$2.8M5.5%
- Bell County, TX$2.1M4.1%
- Madison County, AL$2M3.9%
- Ward County, ND$1.8M3.5%
- Cumberland County, NC$867.1K1.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition51%US 39% · $26M
- Sole-source awards41%US 30% · $21M
- Single-offer competitions9.9%US 8.7% · $5.1M
- Urgency justifications0.2%US 5.1% · $84.9K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Army$20.9MDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
- Department of State · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 18, 2020 – May 6, 2026· W912DY20F0510
- Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 29, 2020 – May 29, 2026· W912DY20F0578
- Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Jul 31, 2020 – Apr 29, 2026· W912DY20F0504
- Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Jul 30, 2020 – May 22, 2026· W912DY20F0470
- Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Jul 6, 2021 – Jan 13, 2026· W912DY21F0298
- Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2022 – Jun 1, 2026· W912DY22F0561
- Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Aug 1, 2024 – May 26, 2026· W912DY24F0231
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $3.3M (24 subawards)
16 sub-recipients
- MAIN ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION INC$1.2M37%MINOT, ND · 2 subawards
- ACTIVU CORPORATION$410.4K12%ROCKAWAY, NJ · 1 subaward
- CHINOOK FIRE PROTECTION LLC$252.6K7.6%ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards
- DAIKIN APPLIED AMERICAS INC$242.4K7.3%MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 3 subawards
- LASER ELECTRIC, INC.$171.3K5.2%ESCONDIDO, CA · 1 subaward
- GREENTECH MECHANICAL INC$170.9K5.1%SOPHIA, NC · 3 subawards
- H.A. SACK CO., LLC$132.9K4.0%STATESBORO, GA · 3 subawards
- STEWART GROUP ENTERPRISES, LLC$113.5K3.4%BENSON, NC · 1 subaward
- SIR RALEIGH ELECTRIC, INC.$112.8K3.4%GARNER, NC · 1 subaward
- JB ENGINEERING$84.7K2.5%PYEONGTAEK-SI, NE · 1 subaward
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Its reported sub-contracts equal 6.5% of its FY2026 contract obligations.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $1.3M paid out · $187.2K received
- FY2023: $1.1M paid out · $196.3K received
- FY2024: $50.3K paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $21.4M paid out · $0 received
- FY2026: $3.3M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
75 companies · $28M reported
- HONOLULU, HI · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- MOUNT AIRY, MD · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- UNIVERSAL WIRING SYSTEMS INC$1.8MHILLSBORO, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
20 companies · $39.4M reported
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 77 subawards · Ship and boat building
- FORT WORTH, TX · 39 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 7 subawards · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 48 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- COLE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.$287.4M−54% in FY2026ORLANDO, FL · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- BOWHEAD MISSION SOLUTIONS, LLC$433M−52% in FY2026SPRINGFIELD, VA · 12 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS INC$158.9M−91% in FY2026MADISON, AL · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.