Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MO

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY received $67.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−0.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($67.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$67.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
N6AQKMSLRLH7
Other than small businessEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY company family: 7 registered entities, $428M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY PARK, PA · Family page
    $422.7M
  2. $4.7M
  3. $517.3K
  4. $0
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 257.7KFY2017
  2. 150.1KFY2018
  3. -36.3KFY2019
  4. 51.7KFY2020
  5. 55.4KFY2021
  6. 140.1KFY2022
  7. 144.6KFY2023
  8. 129.1KFY2024
  9. 67.9KFY2025
  10. 67.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$67.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $67.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $67.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Boone County, MO· Education & social services· Feb 13, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· N0622A26FA138
  2. Department of the Navy· Boone County, MO· Education & social services· Aug 15, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· N0622A25FA487

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

411 companies · $757.9M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 20 subawards
  2. LEXINGTON, MA · 24 subawards
  3. PITTSBURGH, PA · 32 subawards

Primes that pay it

259 companies · $425M reported

  1. PA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES$110.1M
    HARRISBURG, PA · 5 subawards
  2. EUGENE, OR · 7 subawards
  3. LAUREL, MD · 29 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$416.3M−35% in FY2026
    AUSTIN, TX · 15 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. CALIFORNIA, MD · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. INNOVATIVE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$343.9M−5.9% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The Pennsylvania State UniversityAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$700K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.2M
$2.2M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$620K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$610K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$700K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$310K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture14 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Education14 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear14 reports
  6. Health issues14 reports
  7. Science and technology14 reports
  8. Transportation13 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.