Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD

PHAEDRUS LLC

PHAEDRUS LLC received $6.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+115% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $10.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($5.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.4M
New awards
2
Sole-source
10.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FAQVMKLKFG31
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 750.4KFY2022
  2. 190KFY2023
  3. 300KFY2024
  4. 3MFY2025
  5. 6.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$5.8M90%
  2. Professional services$639.7K10.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10.0%
    US 39% · $639.7K
  • Sole-source awards10.0%
    US 30% · $639.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Sep 25, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· FA875025CB069
  2. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Oct 10, 2024 – May 8, 2026· N6523625C1017

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PHAEDRUS LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 149.4KFY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2023.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $200K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $338.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $200K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $4M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PRODUCTABLE INC.$7.8M−100% in FY2026
    AUSTIN, TX · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. STELL ENGINEERING, INC.$6.9M−48% in FY2026
    MARINA DEL REY, CA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.