Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY received $22.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 31 awards (−19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $242M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($17.2M). It also received $182.3M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$22.6M
New awards
31
Sole-source
0.3%
Single offer
35%
UEI
NTLHJXM55KZ6
Parent company
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA company family: 6 registered entities, $39.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONATUCSON, AZ · Family page
    $11.5M
  2. $2.1M
  3. $1.8M
  4. $1.6M
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.7MFY2017
  2. 16.9MFY2018
  3. 30.1MFY2019
  4. 23.6MFY2020
  5. 22.8MFY2021
  6. 21.9MFY2022
  7. 32MFY2023
  8. 34.4MFY2024
  9. 28MFY2025
  10. 22.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 8 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$18.8M83%
  2. Education & social services$3.8M17%
  3. Professional services$19.7K0.1%
  4. IT & telecom$7,2000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$7,5960.0%
  2. Pima County, AZ$7,2000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition35%
    US 39% · $8M
  • Sole-source awards0.3%
    US 30% · $78.8K
  • Single-offer competitions35%
    US 8.7% · $7.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$2,449

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE ROBOTIC LUNAR EXPLORATIONLUNAR PRECURSOR ROBOTIC PROGRAM (RLEPLPRP) CONSISTS OF A SERIES OF ROBOTIC LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS TO PREPARE FOR AND TO SUPPORT FUTURE HUMAN EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE ROBOTIC PREPARATION IS TO REDUCE RISK, ENHANCE MISSION SUCCESS, AND REDUCE THE COST OF FUTURE HUMAN MISSIONS. THE LRO PAYLOAD USED TO ACCOMPLISH THE MISSION OBJECTIVES CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING SIX INSTRUMENTS: 1. LUNAR ORBITER LASER ALTIMETER (LOLA) MEASUREMENT INVESTIGATION SHALL DETERMINE THE GLOBAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LUNAR SURFACE AT HIGH RESOLUTION, MEASURE LANDING SITE SLOPES AND SEARCH FOR POLAR ICES IN SHADOWED REGIONS; 2. LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER CAMERA (LROC) SHALL ACQUIRE TARGETED IMAGES OF THE LUNAR SURFACE CAPABLE OF RESOLVING SMALL-SCALE FEATURES THAT COULD BE LANDING SITE HAZARDS, AS WELL AS WIDE-ANGLE IMAGES AT MULTIPLE WAVELENGTHS OF THE LUNAR POLES TO DOCUMENT CHANGING ILLUMINATION CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL RESOURCES; 3. LUNAR EXPLORATION NEUTRON DETECTOR (LEND) SHALL MAP THE FLUX OF NEUTRONS FROM THE LUNAR SURFACE TO SEARCH FOR EVIDENCE OF WATER ICE AND PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE SPACE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT WHICH CAN BE USEFUL FOR FUTURE HUMAN EXPLORATION; 4. DIVINER LUNAR RADIOMETER EXPERIMENT (DLRE) SHALL MAP THE TEMPERATURE OF THE ENTIRE LUNAR SURFACE AT 300 METER HORIZONTAL SCALES TO IDENTIFY COLD-TRAPS AND POTENTIAL ICE DEPOSITS; 5. LYMAN-ALPHA MAPPING PROJECT (LAMP) SHALL OBSERVE THE ENTIRE LUNAR SURFACE IN THE FAR ULTRAVIOLET TO SEARCH FOR SURFACE ICES AND FROSTS IN THE POLAR REGIONS AND TO PROVIDE IMAGES OF PERMANENTLY SHADOWED REGIONS ILLUMINATED ONLY BY STARLIGHT; 6. COSMIC RAY TELESCOPE FOR THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION (CRATER) SHALL INVESTIGATE THE EFFECT OF GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS ON TISSUE-EQUIVALENT PLASTICS AS A CONSTRAINT ON MODELS OF BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO BACKGROUND SPACE RADIATION. EACH INSTRUMENT WILL BE MANAGED BY A PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI), WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE FLIGHT INSTRUMENT TO THE LRO PROJECT, AS WELL AS PRODUCING THE INSTRUMENT'S DATA PRODUCTS AND DELIVERING THEM TO THE PLANETARY DATA SYSTEM (PDS) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR DATA PRODUCT SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT.$92.8M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Oct 27, 2016 – Dec 11, 2025· NNG07EK00C
  2. PSYCHE: JOURNEY TO A METAL WORLD THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR IN SUPPORT OF THE PHASE A CONCEPT DEFINITION PORTION OF THE NASA DISCOVERY PROGRAM 2014 ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY (AO) (NNH14ZDA014O) SOLICITATION DATED NOVEMBER 5, 2014. THE MISSION PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI), DR. LINDA ELKINS-TANTON, OF THE SCHOOL OF EARTH AND SPACE EXPLORATION AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY (ASU), IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUCCESS AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY OF THE MISSION. AS SUCH, THE PI SHALL LEAD THE PROJECT, MANAGE PROJECT RESOURCES, AND DIRECT ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE SCIENCE TEAM CARRIED OUT IN SUPPORT OF THE MISSION. SPECIFICALLY, DURING PHASE A, THE PI WILL LEAD THE MISSION TEAM IN CONDUCTING THE CONCEPT STUDY REPORT AND ASSOCIATED SITE VISIT. SHOULD THE MISSION BE SELECTED TO CONTINUE INTO PHASE B, THE PI WILL LEAD THE TEAM THROUGH THE INITIATION OF THE PHASE B EFFORT WITH A TRANSITION PHASE BETWEEN NOTIFICATION OF AWARD AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PHASE B CONTRACT. THE PI IS ASSISTED BY A DEPUTY PI, DR. JAMES BELL AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. JET PROPULSION LABORATORY (JPL) IS THE MISSION MAJOR PARTNER FOR SPACECRAFT DEVELOPMENT AND MISSION IMPLEMENTATION, AND SHALL SUPPORT THE PI WITH A PROJECT TEAM EXPERIENCED IN MANAGEMENT, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, MISSION DESIGN, PAYLOAD DEVELOPMENT, SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE, NAVIGATION, AND MISSION OPERATIONS. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES TO ADDRESS THE PHASE A CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES ARE: - PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR THE PHASE A CONTRACT - CONDUCT AND SUPPORT OF PHASE A PROJECT REVIEWS - PHASE B/C/D/E SPACECRAFT DEVELOPMENT AND MISSION PLANNING - PHASE B/C/D/E COST ESTIMATES - CONCEPT STUDY REPORT PREPARATION - ORALS/SITE VISIT SUPPORT BY KEY PERSONNEL THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR IN SUPPORT OF THE PHASE A CONCEPT DEFINITION PORTION OF THE NASA DISCOVERY PROGRAM 2014 ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY (AO) (NNH14ZDA014O) SOLICITATION DATED NOVEMBER 5, 2014. THE MISSION PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI), DR. LINDA ELKINS-TANTON, OF THE SCHOOL OF EARTH AND SPACE EXPLORATION AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY (ASU), IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUCCESS AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY OF THE MISSION. AS SUCH, THE PI SHALL LEAD THE PROJECT, MANAGE PROJECT RESOURCES, AND DIRECT ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE SCIENCE TEAM CARRIED OUT IN SUPPORT OF THE MISSION. SPECIFICALLY, DURING PHASE A, THE PI WILL LEAD THE MISSION TEAM IN CONDUCTING THE CONCEPT STUDY REPORT AND ASSOCIATED SITE VISIT. SHOULD THE MISSION BE SELECTED TO CONTINUE INTO PHASE B, THE PI WILL LEAD THE TEAM THROUGH THE INITIATION OF THE PHASE B EFFORT WITH A TRANSITION PHASE BETWEEN NOTIFICATION OF AWARD AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PHASE B CONTRACT. THE PI IS ASSISTED BY A DEPUTY PI, DR. JAMES BELL AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. JET PROPULSION LABORATORY (JPL) IS THE MISSION MAJOR PARTNER FOR SPACECRAFT DEVELOPMENT AND MISSION IMPLEMENTATION, AND SHALL SUPPORT THE PI WITH A PROJECT TEAM EXPERIENCED IN MANAGEMENT, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, MISSION DESIGN, PAYLOAD DEVELOPMENT, SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE, NAVIGATION, AND MISSION OPERATIONS. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES TO ADDRESS THE PHASE A CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES ARE: - PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR THE PHASE A CONTRACT - CONDUCT AND SUPPORT OF PHASE A PROJECT REVIEWS - PHASE B/C/D/E SPACECRAFT DEVELOPMENT AND MISSION PLANNING - PHASE B/C/D/E COST ESTIMATES - CONCEPT STUDY REPORT PREPARATION - ORALS/SITE VISIT SUPPORT BY KEY PERSONNEL$50.1M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Dec 30, 2016 – Jun 18, 2026· NNM16AA09C
  3. Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Apr 5, 2017 – Jul 6, 2026· HHSO100201000008C
  4. NASA IS SOLICITING PROPOSALS FOR SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS THAT MIGHT REVEAL ANSWERS ABOUT LUNAR RESOURCES THAT COULD SUPPORT THE AGENCY'S JOURNEY TO MARS. NASA WOULD SPONSOR THE INSTRUMENTS TO FLY ON A LUNAR ORBITER DESIGNED BY THE KOREA AEROSPACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (KARI). THE SPACECRAFT, THE KOREA PATHFINDER LUNAR ORBITER (KPLO), IS SCHEDULED TO LAUNCH IN DECEMBER 2018, AND IS PART OF KARI'S KOREA LUNAR EXPLORATION PROGRAM, WHICH AIMS TO ROBOTICALLY EXPLORE THE MOON THROUGH A SERIES OF ORBITER AND LANDER MISSIONS, STARTING WITH THE KPLO. KARI, HEADQUARTERED IN DAEJEON, SOUTH KOREA, PROVIDED NASA WITH ABOUT 33 POUNDS (15 KILOGRAMS) OF PAYLOAD MASS ABOARD THE KPLO, WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO LAUNCH INTO LUNAR ORBIT IN DECEMBER 2018. IN SEPTEMBER 2016, NASA ISSUED A SOLICITATION SEEKING SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS THAT COULD INCREASE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF VOLATILES, SUCH AS WATER, INCLUDING THE MOVEMENT OF SUCH RESOURCES TOWARD PERMANENTLY SHADOWED REGIONS AND HOW THEY BECOME TRAPPED THERE. SHADOWCAM WILL MAP THE REFLECTANCE WITHIN THE PERMANENTLY SHADOWED REGIONS TO SEARCH FOR EVIDENCE OF FROST OR ICE DEPOSITS. THE INSTRUMENT'S OPTICAL CAMERA IS BASED ON THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER NARROW ANGLE CAMERA, BUT IS 800 TIMES MORE SENSITIVE, ALLOWING IT TO OBTAIN HIGH-RESOLUTION, HIGH SIGNAL-TO-NOISE IMAGING OF THE MOON'S PERMANENTLY SHADOWED REGIONS. SHADOWCAM WILL OBSERVE THE PSRS MONTHLY TO DETECT SEASONAL CHANGES AND MEASURE THE TERRAIN INSIDE THE CRATERS, INCLUDING THE DISTRIBUTION OF BOULDERS. NASA'S ADVANCED EXPLORATION SYSTEMS DIVISION (AES) LED THE PAYLOAD SOLICITATION AND SELECTION FOR THE NASA INSTRUMENT ON KPLO. A DIVISION OF THE HUMAN EXPLORATION AND OPERATIONS MISSION DIRECTORATE, AES USES INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS TO RAPIDLY DEVELOP PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS, ADVANCE KEY CAPABILITIES, AND VALIDATE OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR FUTURE HUMAN MISSIONS BEYOND EARTH ORBIT. THROUGH THIS PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY WITH KARI, AES IS ADDRESSING KEY LUNAR SKGS WHILE COMPLEMENTING KARI'S PRIMARY MISSION OBJECTIVES AND INSTRUMENTS.$20.5M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Jun 14, 2017 – Jun 9, 2026· NNH17CG00C
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Apr 28, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 80MSFC26C0002
  6. Department of the Navy· Prince George's County, MD· Education & social services· Jun 2, 2022 – Jan 12, 2026· N0018922FZ480
  7. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Maricopa County, AZ· Research & development· Sep 1, 2023 – Dec 3, 2025· HR001123C0130
  8. Department of the Navy· Maricopa County, AZ· Education & social services· Oct 1, 2021 – May 1, 2026· N0018922FZ001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY received $182.3M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 821 actions (184 new awards), −23% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.866 · Aging Research ($16.9M).

Assistance · FY2026
$182.3M
New awards
184
Actions
821
Since FY2021
$1.9B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 543.1MFY2021
  2. 284.8MFY2022
  3. 346.5MFY2023
  4. 340MFY2024
  5. 237MFY2025
  6. 182.3MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$174.2M96%
  2. Direct payments$7.5M4.1%
  3. Other assistance$611.5K0.3%

Top programs

  1. 93.866 · Aging Research$16.9M9.3%
  2. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$12.1M6.7%
  3. 43.001 · Science$10.6M5.8%
  4. 47.041 · Engineering$10.2M5.6%
  5. 47.070 · Computer and Information Science and Engineering$10M5.5%
  6. 47.074 · Biological Sciences$9.6M5.3%
  7. 93.384 · Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (Arpa-H)$7.5M4.1%
  8. 93.279 · Drug Use and Addiction Research Programs$6.3M3.4%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Commerce
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 47.074 · Biological Sciences· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Mar 8, 2023 – Aug 31, 2026· 2153503
  2. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Sep 29, 2023 – Jul 9, 2026· DEEE0010725
  3. 97.061 · Centers for Homeland Security· Office of the Under Secretary for Science and Technology· Cooperative agreement· May 6, 2021 – Jun 9, 2026· 2017ST061QA0001
  4. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Feb 18, 2021 – Jan 30, 2026· NNX16AD79A
  5. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Jan 29, 2024 – Aug 11, 2026· 2315479
  6. 93.360 · Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (Barda), Biodefense Medical Countermeasure Development· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Oct 13, 2020 – Mar 12, 2026· U54MD002316

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.2M (12 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $14.9M (67 subawards)

62 sub-recipients

  1. CARBON COLLECT INC$2.9M16%
    MENLO PARK, CA · 2 subawards
  2. BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION$1M5.7%
    LEAWOOD, KS · 1 subaward
  3. LONGMONT, CO · 1 subaward
  4. BERKELEY, CA · 1 subaward
  5. KNOXVILLE, TN · 1 subaward
  6. HELIOS GLOBAL, INC$617.3K3.4%
    TUCSON, AZ · 3 subawards
  7. PHOENIX, AZ · 3 subawards
  8. SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 3 subawards
  9. CAMBRIDGE, MD · 1 subaward
  10. DAVIS, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.4M (5 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $41.6M (132 subawards)

89 primes

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 5 subawards
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 2 subawards
  3. FAIRBANKS, AK · 2 subawards
  4. ORLANDO, FL · 1 subaward
  5. BALTIMORE, MD · 3 subawards
  6. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards
  7. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 2 subawards
  8. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$1.3M2.7%
    ORANGE, CA · 2 subawards
  9. BETHESDA, MD · 2 subawards
  10. NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 14% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $45.6M paid out · $48.1M received
  • FY2022: $63M paid out · $42.3M received
  • FY2023: $62M paid out · $55M received
  • FY2024: $61M paid out · $138.2M received
  • FY2025: $49.3M paid out · $40.3M received
  • FY2026: $18.1M paid out · $47M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

672 companies · $631M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 23 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. PHOENIX, AZ · 19 subawards
  3. PHOENIX, AZ · 12 subawards

Primes that pay it

384 companies · $729.2M reported

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 248 subawards
  2. PHOENIX, AZ · 86 subawards
  3. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY$23.9M
    PHOENIX, AZ · 143 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 59 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$122.5M−75% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. HAMPTON, VA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. BOULDER, CO · 7 entities · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Arizona State UniversityAI match · 100%
  • Arizona State University ASUAI match · 100%
  • Northern Arizona UniversityAI match · 100%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAAI match · 100%
  • University of Arizona Health SciencesAI match · 99%
  • Northern Arizona University FoundationAI match · 94%
  • University of Arizona FoundationAI match · 93%
Lobbying · 2025
$1M
46 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3M
$2.9M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$643K
    47 reports
  2. 2024$666.6K
    39 reports
  3. 2025$1M
    46 reports
  4. 2026$720K
    26 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations88 reports
  2. Education85 reports
  3. Defense59 reports
  4. Science and technology38 reports
  5. Aerospace30 reports
  6. Natural resources29 reports
  7. Immigration25 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund17 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE142 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES140 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC$700K
    14 reports
  2. Congressional Solutions, Inc (CSI)$568K
    15 reports
  3. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$530K
    11 reports
  4. CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC$450K
    7 reports
  5. Tiber Creek Group$340K
    6 reports
  6. THE ARTEMIS GROUP, LLC (OKLAHOMA)$310K
    6 reports
  7. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$300K
    5 reports
  8. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$220K
    7 reports

17 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.