Federal contractor · PLEASANTON, CA

PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC

No contract obligations recorded for PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MTP2G9JYW8B6
Parent company
PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC. company family: 5 registered entities, $22.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.ANDOVER, MA · Family page
    $20.8M
  2. FARADAY TECHNOLOGY, INC.ENGLEWOOD, OH
    $2.1M
  3. Q-PEAK, INCORPORATEDBEDFORD, MA
    $0
  4. RESEARCH SUPPORT INSTRUMENTS, INC.ANDOVER, MA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 197KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

89 companies · $27.6M reported

  1. ADVANCED SILICON CARBIDE MATERIALS LLC$4.6M
    LIHUE, HI · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. ELBIT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA - NIGHT VISION LLC$1.2M
    ROANOKE, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE$1.1M
    CHESTNUT HILL, MA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $24.2M reported

  1. MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$9.1M
    SPRINGFIELD, MO · 3 subawards
  2. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$5.1M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2.5M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 7 subawards · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 20 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TOYON RESEARCH CORPORATION$154.3M−36% in FY2026
    GOLETA, CA · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services+3 more
  2. INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS INC$100.7M−37% in FY2026
    TORRANCE, CA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services+2 more
  3. OCEANIT LABORATORIES INC$68.1M−62% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC. (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Physical Sciences Inc.AI match · 99%
  • Physical Sciences Inc. (PSI)AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$170K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$535K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$135K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$170K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$110K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Small business28 reports
  2. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ML Strategies, LLC$280K
    14 reports
  2. Strategic Marketing Innovations$255K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.