Federal contractor · LAWRENCE, MA

PORT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

PORT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION received $34.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−87% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($34.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$34.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
LRNPUBGWKNA1
Other than small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 53KFY2019
  3. 3MFY2020
  4. 166.8KFY2021
  5. 905.9KFY2022
  6. 39.8KFY2023
  7. 37.5KFY2024
  8. 255.9KFY2025
  9. 34.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$34.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $34.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $34.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Nov 17, 2025 – Nov 17, 2025· N0017326P5007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $6.1M (23 subawards)

8 primes

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 6 subawards
  2. ANDOVER, MA · 9 subawards
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$115.9K1.9%
    MARLBOROUGH, MA · 2 subawards
  4. RAYTHEON COMPANY$105.9K1.7%
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 1 subaward
  5. CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 2 subawards
  6. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 1 subaward
  7. MCKINNEY, TX · 1 subaward
  8. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $15.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $38.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $39M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $22.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $47.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $6.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $168.7M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 333 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 128 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GROTON, CT · 16 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SANTA ANA, CA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK, AUS · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. PHRONTIER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$184.4K−100% in FY2026
    LAKE FOREST, CA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.