Federal contractor · LATROBE, PA

PRODUCT EVALUATION SYSTEMS, LLC.

PRODUCT EVALUATION SYSTEMS, LLC. received $541.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+177% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $877K. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($541.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$541.5K
New awards
4
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
SKBJKKT8MRD5
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 140KFY2024
  2. 195.6KFY2025
  3. 541.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$541.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $541.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $541.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Westmoreland County, PA· Professional services· Jun 22, 2026 – Jun 22, 2026· 80NSSC26P0844
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Westmoreland County, PA· Professional services· Mar 17, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 80NSSC26P0337
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Westmoreland County, PA· Professional services· Aug 27, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· 80NSSC25PB823
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jun 12, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· 80NSSC26P0806

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $893.1K (13 subawards)

2 primes

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 11 subawards
  2. JOHNSTOWN, PA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $619.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $338K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $139.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $893.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2M reported

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 19 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. JOHNSTOWN, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRIGGS TECH, LLC$736.4K+8% in FY2026
    ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AMU ENGINEERING INC$804.3K−100% in FY2026
    MIAMI, FL · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. D2K TECHNOLOGIES LLC$1M−100% in FY2026
    OCEANSIDE, CA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.