Federal contractor · NORFOLK, VA
PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS & TECHNOLOGIES INC
PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS & TECHNOLOGIES INC received $16M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−6.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $51.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($16M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $16M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 35%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- DUQKMDGAMAK3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.4MFY2017
- 4.7MFY2018
- 5.4MFY2019
- 2MFY2020
- 99.9KFY2021
- 3.1MFY2024
- 17.2MFY2025
- 16MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$16M100%5 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$9.8M61%
- Research & development$6.2M38%
- Other equipment & supplies$29.1K0.2%
Where the work was performed
- San Diego County, CA$9.8M61%
- Norfolk city, VA$6.1M38%
- Arapahoe County, CO$29.1K0.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition35%US 39% · $5.6M
- Sole-source awards35%US 30% · $5.6M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · -$500
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Oct 16, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· N0003925F3000
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Research & development· Jul 22, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· N6833524C0001
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Research & development· May 8, 2025 – Apr 9, 2026· N0002425CS060
- SWITCHES$29.1KDepartment of the Navy· Arapahoe County, CO· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 21, 2025 – Mar 11, 2026· N0016426FM901
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jan 2, 2019 – Jun 5, 2026· N0017819F8345
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $25.4M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $8.9M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
4 companies · $43.5M reported
- FORT WORTH, TX · 111 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
- FAIRFAX, VA · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services
- ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- HODGES TRANSPORTATION, INC.$34.3M−29% in FY2026SILVER SPRINGS, NV · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MAKAI OCEAN ENGINEERING INC$37M−25% in FY2026WAIMANALO, HI · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
- AUSGAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$20.2M−89% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.