Federal contractor · ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
PROMARK TECHNOLOGY INC
PROMARK TECHNOLOGY INC received $593.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $30.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($218.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $593.6K
- New awards
- 14
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 5.4%
- UEI
- JUP5NWBUV9D6
- Parent company
- WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN ASA
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLC company family: 11 registered entities, $49.4M in FY2026 together. See the family
- BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLCCHARLOTTE, NC · Family page$46.1M
- WESCO AIRCRAFT HARDWARE CORP.FORT WORTH, TX$1.1M
- WESCO AIRCRAFT HARDWARE CORP.WICHITA, KS$951.7K
- AMERICAN & EFIRD LLCMOUNT HOLLY, NC$592K
- ELECTRO RENT CORPORATIONWEST HILLS, CA$123.3K
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5MFY2017
- 2.6MFY2018
- 2.2MFY2019
- 6.2MFY2020
- 4.6MFY2021
- 2MFY2022
- 3.7MFY2023
- 1.9MFY2024
- 1.9MFY2025
- 593.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$218.9K37%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$211.1K36%9 awards
- Federal Communications Commission$133.6K23%1 awards
- Indian Health Service$29.7K5.0%1 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$1920.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$309.7K52%
- Other equipment & supplies$283.9K48%
Where the work was performed
- Nassau County, NY$156K26%
- District of Columbia, DC$133.6K23%
- Pima County, AZ$89.1K15%
- Bexar County, TX$49.2K8.3%
- Virginia Beach city, VA$45K7.6%
- Howard County, MD$32.1K5.4%
- Pawnee County, OK$29.7K5.0%
- Greene County, OH$24.8K4.2%
- Cumberland County, NC$20K3.4%
- Abroad$14K2.4%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition5.4%US 39% · $31.9K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions5.4%US 8.8% · $31.9K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- DELL WORKSTATIONS$173.9KDepartment of the Navy· Nassau County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· N6893626F5055
- OCS AND OCX IT EQUIPMENT$167.9KDepartment of the Air Force· Fairfax city, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· FA714625F0074
- Federal Communications Commission· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 31, 2025· 273FCC26F0002
- Department of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· IT & telecom· Feb 12, 2026 – Feb 12, 2026· FA487726F0086
- Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2025 – Apr 3, 2026· FA860425FB490
- Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· FA877326F0060
- Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· N3596A26F0024
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
38 companies · $124.4M reported
- RAYTHEON COMPANY$96.7MTUCSON, AZ · 129 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- FORT WORTH, TX · 143 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- THE BOEING COMPANY$3.6MSAINT LOUIS, MO · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 49 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- 3M COMPANY$231.7M−56% in FY2026SAINT PAUL, MN · 16 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric mills
- EXCEL GARMENT MANUFACTURING, LIMITED$45.8M−109% in FY2026EL PASO, TX · 7.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric millsDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing
- THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND, INCORPORATED$114M−35% in FY2026SEATTLE, WA · 2 entities · 6.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Fabric millsDefense Logistics Agency · Cut and sew apparel manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.