Federal contractor · PASADENA, CA

PTSI MANAGED SERVICES INC

PTSI MANAGED SERVICES INC received $336.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (+96% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1B. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($324.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$336.8M
New awards
19
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.1%
UEI
V6HHNX7LE717
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.3MFY2017
  2. 36.9MFY2018
  3. 29.5MFY2019
  4. 35.9MFY2020
  5. 29.3MFY2021
  6. 43.1MFY2022
  7. 126.5MFY2023
  8. 189.2MFY2024
  9. 172.2MFY2025
  10. 336.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 8 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$324.1M96%
  2. Equipment maintenance$9.3M2.8%
  3. Professional services$3.3M1.0%
  4. IT & telecom$155K0.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$476.7K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.1%
    US 39% · $3.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.1%
    US 8.8% · $3.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Mar 30, 2023 – Sep 22, 2026· 693KA923F00076
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Construction & real property· Mar 28, 2017 – Jul 21, 2026· NNG17AZ09C
  3. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2022 – Apr 17, 2026· W912DY22F0616
  4. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2018 – May 27, 2026· W911S018F0263
  5. Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 13, 2022 – Jul 15, 2026· 33330222FF0010422
  6. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Professional services· Jun 20, 2023 – May 5, 2026· W900KK23F5008
  7. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Jun 21, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W912DY24F0134
  8. Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 5, 2026· W912DY24F0638

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $13M (19 subawards)

17 sub-recipients

  1. NEW WINDSOR, NY · 2 subawards
  2. LORTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. GAITHERSBURG, MD · 1 subaward
  4. BOHINJSKA BISTRICA, SVN · 1 subaward
  5. WILMINGTON, DE · 1 subaward
  6. SAVANNAH, GA · 1 subaward
  7. MILWAUKEE, WI · 1 subaward
  8. SPOKANE VALLEY, WA · 1 subaward
  9. SIR RALEIGH ELECTRIC, INC.$160K1.2%
    GARNER, NC · 2 subawards
  10. ENGINEERED CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.$120.1K0.9%
    MIAMI, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.9% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.2M paid out · $35.8M received
  • FY2022: $7.5M paid out · $3M received
  • FY2023: $9.6M paid out · $18.8M received
  • FY2024: $7.8M paid out · $39.8M received
  • FY2025: $23.4M paid out · $20.9M received
  • FY2026: $13M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

89 companies · $69.6M reported

  1. LEESBURG, VA · 22 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  2. NEW WINDSOR, NY · 10 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HECK INC$5.5M
    CARTERSVILLE, GA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $118.4M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 97 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 35 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 4 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PHOENIX LOGISTICS, LLC$149M−20% in FY2026
    GILBERT, AZ · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. OVIEDO, FL · 8.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. VENCEDOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC$59.8M−67% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 8.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.