Federal contractor · AURORA, CO

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, THE

No contract obligations recorded for REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, THE in FY2026. Since FY2020: $0.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CL8WFWS44X54
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO company family: 7 registered entities, $72.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $67.1M
  2. $3.6M
  3. $2M
  4. $0
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.6KFY2020
  2. 0FY2021
  3. -18.6KFY2022

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, THE in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $206.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $845.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $441.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

532 companies · $600M reported

  1. OAKLAND, CA · 81 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 23 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

313 companies · $893.5M reported

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 5 subawards
  2. YORK, PA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. DENVER, CO · 74 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 43 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. BARRIOS TECHNOLOGY, LLC$153.7M−79% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. MITCHELL VANTAGE SYSTEMS LLC$158.8M−42% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The Regents of the University of ColoradoAI match · 100%
  • The Regents of the University of Colorado obo University of Colorado AnschutzAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$840K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$240K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$240K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Science and technology14 reports
  3. Defense10 reports
  4. Education5 reports
  5. Disaster planning and emergencies2 reports
  6. Economics and economic development1 reports
  7. Health issues1 reports
  8. Homeland security1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC$840K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.