Federal contractor · SIMI VALLEY, CA

RUGGED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

RUGGED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION received -$35.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−107% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Contract Management Agency (-$4,000).

Obligations · FY2026
-$35.2K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YC2MMREDU3N1
Parent company
ASTRONOVA, INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ASTRONOVA, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $96.1K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ASTRONOVA, INC.WEST WARWICK, RI · Family page
    $131.3K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 389.1KFY2017
  2. 544.5KFY2018
  3. 190.8KFY2019
  4. 6.4KFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. -87.6KFY2022
  7. 811.3KFY2023
  8. -6.8KFY2024
  9. 504.8KFY2025
  10. -35.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· IT & telecom· May 1, 2025 – Mar 11, 2026· N0010425PDB20
  2. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· IT & telecom· May 1, 2025 – May 11, 2026· N0010425PDB19
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jul 22, 2021 – Oct 28, 2025· 0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $681.7K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $7.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $738.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $560.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $243.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $623.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $681.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $15.5M reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 45 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WK ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.$977.8K−100% in FY2026
    SANTA CLARITA, CA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 2 entities · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ACTRONICS INCORPORATED$1M+16% in FY2026
    WALTHAM, MA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.