Federal contractor · MONTGOMERY, AL

SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS PAGESOUTHERLANDPAGE JOINT VENTURE

No contract obligations recorded for SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS PAGESOUTHERLANDPAGE JOINT VENTURE in FY2026. Since FY2017: $28.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
JLKTDFHLT986
Parent company
SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $645.9K in FY2026 together.

  1. SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS PAGESOUTHERLANDPAGE JOINT VENTUREMONTGOMERY, AL · Family page
    $0
  2. SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS INC.MONTGOMERY, AL
    $644.9K
  3. SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS-CLARK NEXSEN JOINT VENTUREMONTGOMERY, AL
    $1,000

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.6MFY2017
  2. 5.6MFY2018
  3. 867.7KFY2019
  4. 1.3MFY2020
  5. 6.3MFY2021
  6. 346.1KFY2022
  7. 505.3KFY2023
  8. 5.2MFY2024
  9. 985.6KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT IDC FOR ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF MOBILE DISTRICT DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY DHA PROGRAM AT VARIOUS MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.$995.6K
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Jun 26, 2025 – Mar 27, 2026· W9127825FA047

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $63.5K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. CRAWFORD CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.$63.5K100%
    EAST PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $794.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $542.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $342.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $326K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $63.5K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

20 companies · $3.9M reported

  1. THE INNOVA GROUP, LLC$1M
    AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$425.2K
    EVERETT, WA · 1 subaward
  3. SMITH SECKMAN REID, INC.$331.1K
    NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EUSTIS ENGINEERING, L.L.C.$7.5M−95% in FY2026
    METAIRIE, LA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BRUCE S ROSENBLATT & ASSOCIATES LLC$7.5M−28% in FY2026
    ALAMEDA, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. KBP SOLUTIONS, LLC$7.8M−100% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.