Federal contractor · MONTGOMERY, AL

SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS INC.

SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS INC. received $644.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−16% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($644.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$644.9K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
XJHFG7J6ZGC5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS PAGESOUTHERLANDPAGE JOINT VENTURE company family: 3 registered entities, $645.9K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS PAGESOUTHERLANDPAGE JOINT VENTUREMONTGOMERY, AL · Family page
    $0
  2. SHERLOCK, SMITH & ADAMS-CLARK NEXSEN JOINT VENTUREMONTGOMERY, AL
    $1,000

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.9MFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. -15KFY2019
  4. -60.3KFY2021
  5. -37.4KFY2022
  6. -16.2KFY2023
  7. 2.5KFY2024
  8. 766.7KFY2025
  9. 644.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$644.9K100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$644.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, AL$385.2K60%
  2. Honolulu County, HI$258.7K40%
  3. Mobile County, AL$1,0000.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $644.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $644.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. B14500 COMPREHENSIVE INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE, FGGA$383.7K
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Feb 9, 2026 – Feb 9, 2026· W912HN26FA022
  2. DISA PAC BUILDING 77 LIFE SAFETY PROJECT, FORD ISLAND, OAHU, HAWAII$258.7K
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· W9128A26FA023
  3. MINIMUM GUARANTEE FOR W912HN-26-D-2004 - SHERLOCK, SMITH AND ADAMS INC.$2,500
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Jan 13, 2026 – Jan 13, 2026· W912HN26FA015
  4. SHERLOCK, SMITH AND ADAMS, INC. (SB) MINIMUM GUARANTEE$1,000
    Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· W9127826FA175
  5. GUARANTEED MINIMUM TASK ORDER$0
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Jul 31, 2025 – Feb 5, 2026· W9127825F0159

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (8 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$425.2K31%
    EVERETT, WA · 1 subaward
  2. SMITH SECKMAN REID, INC.$331.1K24%
    NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward
  3. SCHNABEL ENGINEERING, LLC$242.7K18%
    GLEN ALLEN, VA · 1 subaward
  4. CYBERNET SYSTEMS CORPORATION$154.5K11%
    ORLANDO, FL · 1 subaward
  5. SAM O HIROTA INC$86.3K6.3%
    HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward
  6. CORE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.$82K6.0%
    WINTER PARK, FL · 2 subawards
  7. ENGINEERS OF THE SOUTH$47.4K3.5%
    FLORENCE, AL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 212% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

20 companies · $3.9M reported

  1. THE INNOVA GROUP, LLC$1M
    AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$425.2K
    EVERETT, WA · 1 subaward
  3. SMITH SECKMAN REID, INC.$331.1K
    NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EUSTIS ENGINEERING, L.L.C.$7.5M−95% in FY2026
    METAIRIE, LA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BRUCE S ROSENBLATT & ASSOCIATES LLC$7.5M−28% in FY2026
    ALAMEDA, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. KBP SOLUTIONS, LLC$7.8M−100% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.