Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS, INC.

SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS, INC. received $346.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 69 awards (−6.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.8B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($172.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$346.8M
New awards
69
Sole-source
45%
Single offer
7.4%
UEI
TRE8LWVNNXL3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $346.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS, INC.ALEXANDRIA, VA · Family page
    $346.8M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.7MFY2017
  2. 69.3MFY2018
  3. 103.2MFY2019
  4. 99.5MFY2020
  5. 132.4MFY2021
  6. 166.9MFY2022
  7. 207.6MFY2023
  8. 262.6MFY2024
  9. 372.5MFY2025
  10. 346.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 46 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 5 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$245.7M71%
  2. IT & telecom$54.8M16%
  3. Research & development$46.3M13%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$3.5M1.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition52%
    US 39% · $181.2M
  • Sole-source awards45%
    US 30% · $155.4M
  • Single-offer competitions7.4%
    US 8.7% · $25.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  3. Department of Energy · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Mar 29, 2023 – May 6, 2026· N0002423C2103
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jul 7, 2021 – Jun 4, 2026· HDTRA121C0054
  3. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Dec 8, 2022 – May 6, 2026· N0016423F3000
  4. Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 29, 2019 – Apr 24, 2026· HQ003419F0752
  5. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 19, 2024 – May 14, 2026· FA880625FB002
  6. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 21, 2017 – Mar 30, 2026· N0016417F3009
  7. Department of the Navy· Alexandria city, VA· Research & development· Jul 12, 2024 – Apr 16, 2026· N0003024C7002
  8. Department of the Navy· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Oct 28, 2021 – Apr 22, 2026· N0003022C1015

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $14.5M (7 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  2. CADENCE2COMPLETION LLC$3.6M25%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. WOODBRIDGE, VA · 1 subaward
  4. GEN CONSULTING, LLC$811.3K5.6%
    STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward
  5. BLUE MOOSE HIDEAWAY, LLC$715K4.9%
    WARRENTON, VA · 1 subaward
  6. HIVE GROUP, LLC$703.5K4.8%
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  7. FEDERAL ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$149.8K1.0%
    SAN LUIS, AZ · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $33.5M (16 subawards)

9 primes

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. RESTON, VA · 5 subawards
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards
  4. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  5. ROCKVILLE, MD · 3 subawards
  6. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward
  7. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  8. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  9. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 4.2% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $40.1M paid out · $17.7M received
  • FY2022: $1.6M paid out · $50.4M received
  • FY2023: $89.5M paid out · $20M received
  • FY2024: $12.3M paid out · $40.3M received
  • FY2025: $38.7M paid out · $73.3M received
  • FY2026: $14.5M paid out · $33.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

71 companies · $191.6M reported

  1. GREENBELT, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

40 companies · $230.8M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 66 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GOLETA, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 20 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FIDELITY TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC$465.3M−5.7% in FY2026
    READING, PA · 2 entities · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SPRINGFIELD, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$1.2B−34% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS, INC. (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Systems Planning & Analysis, LLCAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$230K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$540K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$150K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$230K
    4 reports
  3. 2026$160K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense10 reports
  2. Intelligence and surveillance3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$490K
    9 reports
  2. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$50K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.