Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

TEC-MASTERS, INC

TEC-MASTERS, INC received $10M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $129.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($8.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$10M
New awards
19
Sole-source
3.2%
Single offer
42%
UEI
HMAMXN2R9864
Small businessMinority-ownedHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.5MFY2017
  2. 18.2MFY2018
  3. 16.7MFY2019
  4. 12.4MFY2020
  5. 9.1MFY2021
  6. 9.2MFY2022
  7. 14.3MFY2023
  8. 15.1MFY2024
  9. 14MFY2025
  10. 10MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.6M55%
  2. Education & social services$2.6M26%
  3. Research & development$1.9M19%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition45%
    US 39% · $4.5M
  • Sole-source awards3.2%
    US 30% · $317.7K
  • Single-offer competitions42%
    US 8.8% · $4.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Professional services· Mar 28, 2023 – Apr 23, 2026· W911S023F0083
  2. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Education & social services· May 5, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· W911S023F0166
  3. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Education & social services· Jun 5, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· W9124L23F0006
  4. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Professional services· Jul 22, 2025 – May 11, 2026· W9124L25FA006
  5. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Professional services· Jun 30, 2022 – May 11, 2026· W911S022F0177
  6. Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Sep 25, 2018 – Apr 9, 2026· FA701418C5018
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Oct 17, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 80JSC025FA007
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jul 24, 2024 – Aug 18, 2026· 80JSC024FA160

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $121.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $43.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.3M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. THOMPSON GRAY, INC.$23.7M−100% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. ASPEN CONSULTING GROUP INC$24.1M−6.1% in FY2026
    POINT PLEASANT BORO, NJ · 2 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.