Federal contractor · CHATSWORTH, CA

TELEDYNE RISI, INC.

TELEDYNE RISI, INC. received $343.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $14.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($343.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$343.8K
New awards
7
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TJMNJL47DK77
Parent company
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC. company family: 98 registered entities, $461.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC.HUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $164.1M
  2. TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC.NORTH BILLERICA, MA
    $77.1M
  3. TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, LLCSTILLWATER, OK
    $68M
  4. TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, LLCSTILLWATER, OK
    $60.2M
  5. TELEDYNE INSTRUMENTS INCPORTSMOUTH, NH
    $31.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.4MFY2017
  2. 1.8MFY2018
  3. 2.2MFY2019
  4. 3.2MFY2020
  5. 1.5MFY2021
  6. 1.6MFY2022
  7. 1.2MFY2023
  8. 535.3KFY2024
  9. 736.8KFY2025
  10. 343.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$343.8K100%
    7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$315.8K92%
  2. Equipment maintenance$28K8.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Los Angeles County, CA$315.8K92%
  2. Calvert County, MD$28K8.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $343.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $343.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$343.8K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. RECOVERY SEQUENCER,$319.9K
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 4, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· N0038326FT100
  2. RECOVERY SEQUENCER,$313.1K
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 18, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· N0038325FT100
  3. RECOVERY SEQUENCER,$302.4K
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 26, 2024 – Mar 24, 2026· N0038324FT101
  4. RECOVERY SEQUENCER,$156.6K
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 10, 2025 – Mar 5, 2026· N0038325FT101
  5. SEQUENCER, NACES SEAT$32K
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 5, 2025 – May 6, 2026· N0038325P029M
  6. ELECTRONIC SEQUENCE TEST & EVAL$25K
    Department of the Navy· Calvert County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Feb 9, 2026 – Feb 9, 2026· N6852026P0011
  7. ELECTRONIC SEQUENCER T/E S/N PSZ0021$18K
    Department of the Navy· Calvert County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Feb 13, 2025 – Jan 27, 2026· N6852025P0035

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $68.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BOEING COMPANY, THE$68.2K100%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · -$314.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $196.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $68.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

272 companies · $387.9M reported

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$36M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 20 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ZIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$28.4M
    CLEVELAND, OH · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$24.9M
    RESTON, VA · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

113 companies · $1.7B reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$422.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 496 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$272.9M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 479 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$185.8M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 156 subawards · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 132 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SRC INC$470.6M−38% in FY2026
    NORTH SYRACUSE, NY · 2 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+3 more
  2. AERODYNE-SGT ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC$258.1M−31% in FY2026
    CAPE CANAVERAL, FL · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. SPACE NETWORK SOLUTIONS LLC$276.2M−20% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC. (98 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Teledyne FLIRAI match · 100%
  • Teledyne FLIR (Formerly FLIR Systems Inc.AI match · 100%
  • Teledyne Scientific & ImagingAI match · 100%
  • Teledyne TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.AI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$460K
11 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.6M
PAC giving · 2022
$18.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$462K
    11 reports
  2. 2024$400K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$460K
    11 reports
  4. 2026$250K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense28 reports
  2. Automotive industry14 reports
  3. Homeland security14 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations5 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear5 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES31 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE31 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. A1.9 STRATEGIES LLC$840K
    14 reports
  2. Public Strategies Washington, Inc.$552K
    14 reports
  3. Strategic Marketing Innovations$110K
    5 reports
  4. Echelon Government Affairs$70K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2022 cycle

  1. Democratic$15.5K84%
  2. Republican$3,00016%

PACs sponsored

  • FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (FLIRPAC)$7,650 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.