Federal contractor · NORTH SYRACUSE, NY

SRC INC

SRC INC received $98.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 65 awards (−38% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($47.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$98.5M
New awards
65
Sole-source
66%
Single offer
2.2%
UEI
DC9UXK381JR5
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $98.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. SRC INCNORTH SYRACUSE, NY · Family page
    $98.5M
  2. SAZE TECHNOLOGIES, LLCSILVER SPRING, MD
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 182.7MFY2017
  2. 193MFY2018
  3. 171.3MFY2019
  4. 123.7MFY2020
  5. 137.9MFY2021
  6. 131.7MFY2022
  7. 208.7MFY2023
  8. 212.9MFY2024
  9. 159.4MFY2025
  10. 98.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 18 awards
  2. 14 awards
  3. 15 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 5 awards
  8. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$85.6M87%
  2. Research & development$12.5M13%
  3. Equipment maintenance$297.5K0.3%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$71.5K0.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition68%
    US 39% · $66.9M
  • Sole-source awards66%
    US 30% · $64.7M
  • Single-offer competitions2.2%
    US 8.8% · $2.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 4 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Aug 30, 2023 – Nov 24, 2025· W31P4Q23F0231
  2. Department of the Army· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Mar 14, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· W31P4Q25F0016
  3. Department of the Army· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Feb 27, 2026 – May 8, 2026· W31P4Q26F0026
  4. Department of the Air Force· Onondaga County, NY· Research & development· Oct 8, 2021 – Feb 12, 2026· FA875022C0519
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Sep 3, 2024 – Apr 27, 2026· W31P4Q24F0200
  6. Department of the Air Force· Onondaga County, NY· Research & development· Apr 16, 2024 – May 14, 2026· FA237724FB001
  7. Department of the Air Force· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Mar 26, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· FA862025FB059
  8. Department of the Air Force· Onondaga County, NY· Professional services· Mar 31, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· FA862026FB078

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $12.2M (51 subawards)

31 sub-recipients

  1. LAKE FOREST, CA · 7 subawards
  2. AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards
  3. AURORA, ON · 3 subawards
  4. ASHBURN, VA · 3 subawards
  5. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward
  6. EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 3 subawards
  7. AETHERCOMM, INC.$467.4K3.8%
    CARLSBAD, CA · 2 subawards
  8. ALLIANCE TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$312.3K2.6%
    SALEM, NH · 2 subawards
  9. CENTENNIAL, CO · 1 subaward
  10. WINDSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC$257.8K2.1%
    ROCHESTER, NY · 3 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $9.4M (9 subawards)

6 primes

  1. RESTON, VA · 4 subawards
  2. LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  4. LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, MD · 1 subaward
  5. NEWTOWN SQUARE, PA · 1 subaward
  6. ROME, NY · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 12% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $7.3M paid out · $29.9M received
  • FY2022: $6.9M paid out · $7.4M received
  • FY2023: $6.4M paid out · $26.7M received
  • FY2024: $47.8M paid out · $36.6M received
  • FY2025: $34.3M paid out · $30.2M received
  • FY2026: $12.2M paid out · $9.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

126 companies · $115M reported

  1. LAKE FOREST, CA · 45 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. RESTON, VA · 7 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. AUSTIN, TX · 9 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Primes that pay it

28 companies · $140.3M reported

  1. ROY, UT · 34 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 14 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 17 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRX SYSTEMS, INC.$139.5M+25% in FY2026
    GREENBELT, MD · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. RIVERSIDE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$155.9M−10% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FORT WALTON BEACH, FL · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SRC INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SRC Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$390K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.6M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$525K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$460K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$390K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$200K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Defense14 reports
  3. Homeland security14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Roosevelt Group$980K
    14 reports
  2. Westmoreland160, LLC$595K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.