Federal contractor · AUSTIN, TX

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY received $32.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+2.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $311.3K. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($23.7K). It also received $83.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$32.4K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K8D3M5BXYL74
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 29.2KFY2017
  2. 30.7KFY2018
  3. 46.9KFY2019
  4. 25KFY2020
  5. 25.3KFY2021
  6. 29.2KFY2022
  7. 29.7KFY2023
  8. 31KFY2024
  9. 31.7KFY2025
  10. 32.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$32.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $32.4K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $32.4K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Tarrant County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· FA667526P0004
  2. Department of the Army· Travis County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Feb 23, 2026 – Feb 23, 2026· W9126G26PA009

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY received $83.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 42 actions (9 new awards), +22% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants ($33.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$83.1M
New awards
9
Actions
42
Since FY2021
$568.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 51.5MFY2021
  2. 109.3MFY2022
  3. 57.9MFY2023
  4. 198.4MFY2024
  5. 67.9MFY2025
  6. 83.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$83.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants$33.1M40%
  2. 87.051 · Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Comprehensive Plan Component Program$19.9M24%
  3. 87.052 · Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Oil Spill Impact Program$8.9M11%
  4. 66.419 · Water Pollution Control State, Interstate, and Tribal Program Support$4.9M5.9%
  5. 21.015 · Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States$3.8M4.6%
  6. 66.444 · Voluntary School and Child Care Lead Testing and Reduction Grant Program (Sdwa 1464(D))$3.3M4.0%
  7. 66.460 · Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants$2.8M3.3%
  8. 66.456 · National Estuary Program$1.8M2.1%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Treasury
  2. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Grant· Aug 29, 2023 – Jul 30, 2026· 99662724
  2. 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Grant· Sep 29, 2025 – Jul 16, 2026· 99662726
  3. 21.015 · Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States· Departmental Offices· Formula grant· Jul 28, 2021 – Jul 16, 2026· RDCGR480090
  4. 21.015 · Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States· Departmental Offices· Formula grant· Jul 28, 2021 – Jan 21, 2026· RDCGR480085
  5. 87.051 · Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Comprehensive Plan Component Program· Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council· Grant· Sep 9, 2022 – Jul 13, 2026· GT3CP22TX0005
  6. 87.052 · Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council Oil Spill Impact Program· Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council· Grant· Sep 1, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026· GNSSP26TX0083

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $22.7M (58 subawards)

34 sub-recipients

  1. COASTAL PRAIRIE CONSERVANCY$6M26%
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward
  2. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX · 4 subawards
  3. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 10 subawards
  4. THE PARK BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY OF GALVESTON$1.9M8.2%
    GALVESTON, TX · 1 subaward
  5. ARMAND BAYOU NATURE CENTER INC$1.5M6.6%
    PASADENA, TX · 1 subaward
  6. AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards
  7. HOUSTON GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL$745.2K3.3%
    HOUSTON, TX · 4 subawards
  8. CITY OF PORT ARANSAS$674.1K3.0%
    PORT ARANSAS, TX · 1 subaward
  9. STEPHENVILLE, TX · 5 subawards
  10. SAN MARCOS, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $121.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. TEXAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$121.4K100%
    DEL VALLE, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $45.6M paid out · -$33.26 received
  • FY2022: $22.9M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $41.6M paid out · $187.3K received
  • FY2024: $22.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $30.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $22.7M paid out · $121.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

87 companies · $185.6M reported

  1. CORPUS CHRISTI, TX · 24 subawards
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 21 subawards
  3. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 79 subawards

Primes that pay it

1 company · $308.7K reported

  1. TEXAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$308.7K
    DEL VALLE, TX · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. URASOE-SHI, JPN · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Administration of environmental quality programs
  2. ADANA, TUR · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Administration of environmental quality programs
  3. CHUGAI TECHNOS CORPORATION$4.3M+14% in FY2026
    CHUO-KU, JPN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Administration of environmental quality programsArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.