Federal contractor · STEPHENVILLE, TX

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY

No contract obligations recorded for TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY in FY2026. Since FY2017: -$1,126. It also received $39M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CARNQUWDBRP7
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM company family: 9 registered entities, $3.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEMCOLLEGE STATION, TX · Family page
    $0
  2. $3.1M
  3. TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE STATION, TX
    $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -16.1KFY2017
  2. 15KFY2019

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY received $39M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 351 actions (9 new awards), −0.2% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($36.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$39M
New awards
9
Actions
351
Since FY2021
$214M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 53.6MFY2021
  2. 17.1MFY2022
  3. 29.2MFY2023
  4. 36MFY2024
  5. 39.1MFY2025
  6. 39MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$37.5M96%
  2. Grants$1.5M3.8%
  3. Other assistance-$19K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$36.1M93%
  2. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$912.8K2.3%
  3. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$512.3K1.3%
  4. 84.042 · Trio Student Support Services$499.3K1.3%
  5. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound$492.7K1.3%
  6. 10.326 · Capacity Building for Non-Land Grant Colleges of Agriculture (NLGCA)$300K0.8%
  7. 93.372 · 21ST Century Cures Act - Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies$174.4K0.4%
  8. 10.031 · Plant Pest and Disease Management (PPDM)$17.1K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture
  2. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 14, 2024 – Feb 6, 2026· P063P242320
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 22, 2025 – Sep 15, 2026· P063P252320
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 13, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026· P063P262320
  4. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound· Department of Education· Project grant· May 23, 2022 – Jul 27, 2026· P047A220068
  5. 84.042 · Trio Student Support Services· Department of Education· Project grant· Aug 17, 2021 – Aug 10, 2026· P042A200529
  6. 84.335 · Child Care Access Means Parents in School· Department of Education· Project grant· Sep 26, 2023 – Sep 9, 2026· P335A230069

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $143.1K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $795.9K (7 subawards)

3 primes

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 5 subawards
  2. AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward
  3. LUBBOCK, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $29.1M paid out · $29.5M received
  • FY2022: $711.8K paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2023: $139.5K paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2025: $729.4K paid out · $454.9K received
  • FY2026: $143.1K paid out · $795.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

40 companies · $5.9M reported

  1. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 7 subawards
  2. PRAIRIE VIEW, TX · 6 subawards
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 3 subawards

Primes that pay it

63 companies · $174.7M reported

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 33 subawards
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 56 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. TEXAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$13M
    DEL VALLE, TX · 7 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VILLANOVA, PA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$8.5M−29% in FY2026
    STOCKTON, CA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  3. MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY$8.5M−30% in FY2026
    GLENDALE, AZ · 2 entities · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The Texas A&M University SystemAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$630K
19 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.4M
$2.4M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$700K
    20 reports
  2. 2024$650K
    20 reports
  3. 2025$630K
    19 reports
  4. 2026$370K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations42 reports
  2. Agriculture39 reports
  3. Education39 reports
  4. Science and technology28 reports
  5. Homeland security25 reports
  6. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code24 reports
  7. Defense17 reports
  8. Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES64 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE62 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. SCHERTZ STRATEGIES, LLC$270K
    14 reports
  2. KENT CAPERTON CONSULTING$225K
    11 reports
  3. Van Scoyoc Associates$210K
    14 reports
  4. Mr. Brian May$66K
    12 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.