Federal contractor · LEXINGTON PARK, MD

THE MITRE CORPORATION

No contract obligations recorded for THE MITRE CORPORATION in FY2026. Since FY2022: $36M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YR62GCU3ZA15
Parent company
THE MITRE CORPORATION
Other than small businessNonprofit

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE MITRE CORPORATION company family: 3 registered entities, $1.6B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. THE MITRE CORPORATIONMC LEAN, VA · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. $431.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.8MFY2022
  2. 16.1MFY2023
  3. 9.4MFY2024
  4. 2.8MFY2025
  5. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of State· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2022 – Dec 23, 2025· 19AQMM22C0168

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

504 companies · $616.7M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MC LEAN, VA · 17 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $14.9M reported

  1. BIOINDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN ECOSYSTEM$8.8M
    EMERYVILLE, CA · 2 subawards
  2. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. WILLIAMSBURG, VA · 4 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 73 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.8B−26% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE MITRE CORPORATION (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The MITRE CorporationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$180K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$260K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$80K
    1 reports
  2. 2026$180K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Government issues3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE3 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$260K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.