Federal contractor · COMMERCE, CA

TRANSDIGM INC

TRANSDIGM INC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 43 awards (+9.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.3M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2M
New awards
43
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
57%
UEI
KM3DGGLMA444
Parent company
TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ARMTEC DEFENSE PRODUCTS CO. company family: 57 registered entities, $376.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ARMTEC DEFENSE PRODUCTS CO.COACHELLA, CA · Family page
    $71.2M
  2. ARMTEC COUNTERMEASURES COCOACHELLA, CA
    $78.8M
  3. AIRBORNE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA OF CA INCSANTA ANA, CA
    $41.6M
  4. CHAMPION AEROSPACE LLCLIBERTY, SC
    $15.7M
  5. AIRBORNE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA OF NJ INC.PENNSAUKEN, NJ
    $14.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 724.2KFY2017
  2. 640KFY2018
  3. 780KFY2019
  4. 275.5KFY2020
  5. 623KFY2021
  6. 1MFY2022
  7. 612.5KFY2023
  8. 384KFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$2.2M100%
    43 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$2.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Los Angeles County, CA$2.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition57%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions57%
    US 8.8% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 8511680754!CLAMP,LOOP$335.2K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 2, 2025 – Oct 2, 2025· SPE7L126P0411
  2. 8511719332!STRAP,RETAINING$249.1K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 27, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· SPE7L126P1147
  3. 8511772051!CLAMP,LOOP$213.1K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 21, 2025 – Apr 24, 2026· SPE7M426P1077
  4. 8511742790!CLAMP,LOOP$206.5K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 12, 2025 – Nov 12, 2025· SPE7L126P1571
  5. 8511862784!STRAP,RETAINING$206K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· SPE7L126P3435
  6. 8511768354!CLAMP,LOOP$197.4K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 21, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· SPE7M426P1038
  7. 8511909220!CLAMP,LOOP$105.9K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 9, 2026 – Feb 9, 2026· SPE7M426P2063
  8. 8511954741!CLAMP,CABLE,ELECTRI$91.2K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· SPE7L126P4804

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $492.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

58 companies · $745M reported

  1. ST TAMMANY BOX COMPANY$655.4M
    PICAYUNE, MS · 7 subawards · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
  2. LUXFER MAGTECH, INC$19.8M
    TAMAQUA, PA · 38 subawards · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
  3. HANWHA AEROSPACE CO., LTD.$18.2M
    CHANGWON, KOR · 7 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Primes that pay it

68 companies · $2.1B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$1B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1,895 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$246.5M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 600 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$153.4M
    YORK, PA · 66 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 133 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MSM GROUP NORTH AMERICA INC.$635.2M−100% in FY2026
    SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. AMERICAN ORDNANCE LLC$670.1M−60% in FY2026
    MIDDLETOWN, IA · 4 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. SIG SAUER INC.$943.4M−24% in FY2026
    NEWINGTON, NH · 3 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ARMTEC DEFENSE PRODUCTS CO. (57 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • TRANSDIGM GROUP INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$440K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.7M
PAC giving · 2026
$230.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$360K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$380K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$440K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$530K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense15 reports
  2. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES17 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE15 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)3 reports
  4. Justice - Dept of (DOJ)2 reports
  5. Air Force - Dept of1 reports
  6. Army - Dept of (Other)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$1.4M
    14 reports
  2. Miller Strategies, LLC$320K
    2 reports
  3. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$30K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$163K71%
  2. Republican$67.5K29%

PACs sponsored

  • TRANSDIGM GROUP INC. EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$281.6K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.