Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

TRELLISWARE TECHNOLOGIES INC

TRELLISWARE TECHNOLOGIES INC received $3.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $89.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.7M
New awards
8
Sole-source
92%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DUD5VV6N1AD6
Parent company
VIASAT INC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the VIASAT INC company family: 7 registered entities, $336.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. VIASAT INCCARLSBAD, CA · Family page
    $332.6M
  2. VIASAT INCDULUTH, GA
    $0
  3. VIASAT INCINDEPENDENCE, OH
    $0
  4. VIASAT INCTEMPE, AZ
    $0
  5. VIASAT INCGERMANTOWN, MD
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.1MFY2017
  2. 10.9MFY2018
  3. 9.2MFY2019
  4. 18.5MFY2020
  5. 12MFY2021
  6. 6.5MFY2022
  7. 8.8MFY2023
  8. 9.4MFY2024
  9. 5.2MFY2025
  10. 3.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$3.6M98%
  2. Professional services$69.3K1.9%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition92%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards92%
    US 30% · $3.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command· Okaloosa County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 8, 2025 – Oct 8, 2025· H9240126FE001
  2. Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 8, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W91CRB25C5058
  3. U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 7, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· H9240124F0002
  4. U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· H9240126FE030
  5. U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· May 8, 2026 – May 8, 2026· H9240126FE052
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency· Jefferson County, WV· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 70FA5026P00000060
  7. Federal Emergency Management Agency· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 19, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 70FA5026P00000054
  8. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· N6600126P6112

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $24.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $42.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $18M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $10.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

106 companies · $145.8M reported

  1. GREENVILLE, TX · 35 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. ORLANDO, FL · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. SANTA ANA, CA · 3 subawards · Satellite telecommunications

Primes that pay it

58 companies · $460.1M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 124 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 23 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. GREENVILLE, TX · 156 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 34 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIGMA DEFENSE SYSTEMS LLC$414.5M+117% in FY2026
    WARNER ROBINS, GA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. IRIDIUM GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC$243.2M−22% in FY2026
    TEMPE, AZ · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Satellite telecommunications
  3. INMARSAT GOVERNMENT, INC.$604.6M−45% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 3 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Satellite telecommunicationsAir Force · Satellite telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of VIASAT INC (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • TrellisWare Technologies, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • VIASAT, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.5M
34 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$4.9M
$4.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$18.3K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.3M
    24 reports
  2. 2024$1.2M
    24 reports
  3. 2025$1.5M
    34 reports
  4. 2026$830K
    20 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense43 reports
  2. Telecommunications33 reports
  3. Science and technology24 reports
  4. Communications, broadcasting, radio and TV15 reports
  5. Homeland security14 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines5 reports
  7. Budget and appropriations3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE81 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES75 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. DLA Piper LLP (US)$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$1.1M
    14 reports
  3. S-3 Group$420K
    6 reports
  4. GORMAN STRATEGY GROUP, TOO$260K
    14 reports
  5. THE ARTEMIS GROUP, LLC (OKLAHOMA)$230K
    5 reports
  6. ATS Communications, inc. (DBA Silbey Strategies)$210K
    11 reports
  7. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough$200K
    5 reports
  8. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$170K
    3 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$11.8K64%
  2. Democratic$6,50036%

PACs sponsored

  • VIASAT, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('VIASAT PAC')$22.5K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.