Federal contractor · FAIRBANKS, AK

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS received $19.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $123.5M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($19M).

Obligations · FY2026
$19.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G2WCRLHJHD47
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS company family: 9 registered entities, $23.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKSFAIRBANKS, AK · Family page
    $4M
  2. $25.5K
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.5MFY2017
  2. 6.8MFY2018
  3. 9.9MFY2019
  4. 10.7MFY2020
  5. 13.4MFY2021
  6. 14.4MFY2022
  7. 14.7MFY2023
  8. 15.9MFY2024
  9. 15.2MFY2025
  10. 19.1MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$16.3M85%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$2.7M14%
  3. Construction & real property$95K0.5%
  4. IT & telecom$26.8K0.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $19.1M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $19.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Commerce · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Research & development· Jun 22, 2023 – Sep 29, 2026· 80GSFC23CA046
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 26, 2019 – Oct 6, 2026· 80GSFC20C0023
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 1333MJ26P0094
  4. Department of the Air Force· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Professional services· Sep 25, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· FA500424P0056
  5. U.S. Geological Survey· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· IT & telecom· Jun 18, 2026 – Jun 18, 2026· 140G0326P0186

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $27.5M (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $1.4M (1 subaward)

2 primes

  1. PERATON INC.$27.5M95%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $831.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $31.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $28.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

156 companies · $145.7M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 10 subawards
  3. GOLDSTREAM GROUP, INC.$6.9M
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 7 subawards

Primes that pay it

97 companies · $150.9M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 6 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 48 subawards
  3. JUNEAU, AK · 24 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INFLEQTION QUANTUM, LLC$57.3M−7.2% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, CO · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. NEW HORIZONS AERONAUTICS, LLC$38.4M−9.7% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. CORNELL TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$32.4M−33% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • UNIVERSITY OF ALASKAAI match · 96%
Lobbying · 2025
$420K
9 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.5M
$1.5M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$420K
    18 reports
  2. 2024$440K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$420K
    9 reports
  4. 2026$220K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Education28 reports
  2. Science and technology28 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations18 reports
  4. Defense10 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear10 reports
  6. Natural resources10 reports
  7. Agriculture9 reports
  8. Indian and Native American affairs9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE26 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES22 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$490K
    14 reports
  2. Strategies 360$50K
    3 reports
  3. Van Ness Feldman, LLP$0
    9 reports
  4. NORTHERN COMPASS GROUP LLC$0
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.