Federal contractor · LEBANON, NH

WEB SENSING, LLC

WEB SENSING, LLC received $946.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−66% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17M. Its largest customer was Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ($497.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$946.9K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
47%
UEI
PRTXX18CC2N5
Parent company
WEB SENSING, LLC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 750KFY2017
  2. 500KFY2018
  3. 1MFY2019
  4. 1.1MFY2020
  5. 1.4MFY2021
  6. 2.9MFY2022
  7. 3.9MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 2.8MFY2025
  10. 946.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$946.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition47%
    US 39% · $449.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions47%
    US 8.8% · $449.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Grafton County, NH· Research & development· Sep 28, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· HR001122C0187
  2. Department of the Army· Grafton County, NH· Research & development· Feb 12, 2025 – Jun 8, 2026· W912CG25C0007

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

WEB SENSING, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 397.9KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $150K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5,000 received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5,000 received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · -$15.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $144.5K reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FENIX RESEARCH CORP$3.4M−38% in FY2026
    PALO ALTO, CA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. TRAIL OF BITS INC$8.2M−73% in FY2026
    BROOKLYN, NY · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. FORT WALTON BEACH, FL · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.