Federal contractor · ZEELAND, MI

WOODWARD FST, INC

WOODWARD FST, INC received $5.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (+50% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $89.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($3.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.1M
New awards
17
Sole-source
65%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WBJ6T1C4HZF5
Parent company
WOODWARD, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the WOODWARD HRT INC company family: 12 registered entities, $89M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. WOODWARD HRT INCVALENCIA, CA · Family page
    $41M
  2. WOODWARD, INC.LOVES PARK, IL
    $20.1M
  3. WOODWARD, INC.FORT COLLINS, CO
    $12.5M
  4. MPC PRODUCTS CORPORATIONNILES, IL
    $10M
  5. WOODWARD INCLOVES PARK, IL
    $111.6K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.3MFY2017
  2. 10.3MFY2018
  3. 21MFY2019
  4. 6.7MFY2020
  5. 7.1MFY2021
  6. 4.3MFY2022
  7. 7.5MFY2023
  8. 14.4MFY2024
  9. 3.4MFY2025
  10. 5.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$3.1M61%
    8 awards
  2. Defense Logistics Agency$2M39%
    8 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$3.1M61%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1.9M38%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$59.8K1.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ottawa County, MI$5.1M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition65%
    US 39% · $3.3M
  • Sole-source awards65%
    US 30% · $3.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$3.3M
    Department of Defense · 7 awards

Largest awards

  1. OVERHAUL OF F100-PW-220 SPRAY RING ASSEMBLIES$2M
    Department of the Air Force· Ottawa County, MI· Equipment maintenance· Feb 19, 2026 – Feb 19, 2026· FA812126F0051
  2. MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY$1.5M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 24, 2025 – Jan 28, 2026· SPRTA125C1910
  3. 8511783663!SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY$963K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 29, 2025 – Nov 29, 2025· SPE4A726F1583
  4. 8511712900!SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY$963K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 21, 2025 – Oct 21, 2025· SPE4A726F0639
  5. 8510726126!NOZZLE,FUEL INJECTI$847.5K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 28, 2024 – Oct 15, 2025· SPE4A724F9147
  6. 8510577178!SPRAY TIP,NOZZLE,FU$747.3K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 17, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· SPE4A724F7257
  7. 8510527854!SPRAY TIP,NOZZLE,FU$747.3K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 22, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· SPE4A724F6591
  8. 8510527884!SPRAY TIP,NOZZLE,FU$747.3K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Ottawa County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 22, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· SPE4A724F6590

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $10.7M (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION$10.7M100%
    EAST HARTFORD, CT · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $296K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $10.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

57 companies · $17.1M reported

  1. TRUE POSITION TECHNOLOGIES, INC$2.6M
    VALENCIA, CA · 11 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. KAVLICO CORPORATION$1.6M
    THOUSAND OAKS, CA · 6 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. CORONADO MANUFACTURING, INC.$1.6M
    SUN VALLEY, CA · 13 subawards · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $633.2M reported

  1. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY$164.9M
    LYNN, MA · 31 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$151.6M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 386 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$149.9M
    TUCSON, AZ · 57 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 47 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRIUMPH ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS LLC$210.4M−26% in FY2026
    WEST HARTFORD, CT · 21 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+4 more
  2. MOOG INC$403.3M−35% in FY2026
    EAST AURORA, NY · 22 entities · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+6 more
  3. ROCKMART FUEL CONTAINMENT, LLC$166.6M−80% in FY2026
    ROCKMART, GA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of WOODWARD HRT INC (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • WOODWARD, INC.AI match · 94%
PAC giving · 2022
$5,400
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2022 cycle

  1. Republican$5,400100%

PACs sponsored

  • WOODWARD, INC. FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT$22.1K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.