Federal contractor · WORCESTER, MA

WRIGHT LINE LLC

WRIGHT LINE LLC received $389.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.8M. Its largest customer was U.S. Secret Service ($220.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$389.6K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
JKJMKFAFH8B9
Parent company
EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the EATON CORPORATION company family: 63 registered entities, $94.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. EATON CORPORATIONRALEIGH, NC · Family page
    $43.9M
  2. EATON AEROSPACE, LLCJACKSON, MS
    $18.9M
  3. EATON AEROSPACE LLCLOS ANGELES, CA
    $12.4M
  4. EATON CORPORATIONIRVINE, CA
    $4.5M
  5. EATON AEROQUIP LLCJACKSON, MI
    $4.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.8MFY2017
  2. 2.9MFY2018
  3. 2.4MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 1.9MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 1.2MFY2025
  10. 389.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Secret Service$220.9K57%
    3 awards
  2. Federal Aviation Administration$168.7K43%
    2 awards
  3. Department of State-$3.000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$342.6K88%
  2. Professional services$47K12%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$220.9K57%
  2. Kane County, IL$121.7K31%
  3. Atlantic County, NJ$47K12%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $389.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $389.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE WRIGHT LINE FORENSIC LAB FURNITURE FOR THE NYC, DEN, BHM, AND NSH FIELD OFFICES.$1.2M
    U.S. Secret Service· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 14, 2024 – Jul 30, 2026· 70US0924F2GSA2026
  2. WRIGHT LINE FURNITURE FOR WFO$123.5K
    U.S. Secret Service· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 23, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 70US0926F2GSA2381
  3. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR REDESIGN OF THE ZAU E-COMPLEX AREA, SYSTEMS, CONSOLES AND WORK SURFACES.$121.7K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Kane County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 5, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· 697DCK26F00008
  4. OFC FURN$116.6K
    Department of State· Worcester County, MA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 21, 2018 – Mar 11, 2026· 19AQMM18F2082
  5. DIGITAL EVIDENCE FORENSICS LABS FURNITURE$97.5K
    U.S. Secret Service· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· 70US0926F2GSA2359
  6. PURCHASE - WRIGHT LINE VOICE LAB PURCHASE$47K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· Professional services· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· 692M1526F00068

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $489.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $244.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $492.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $129.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

33 companies · $12M reported

  1. FIAT POWERTRAIN TECH N AMERICA$1.9M
    BURR RIDGE, IL · 2 subawards
  2. VRC METAL SYSTEMS, LLC$900K
    BOX ELDER, SD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, THE$739.7K
    COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

68 companies · $1B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$613.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1,065 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$127M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 494 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. BELL TEXTRON INC$53.4M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 107 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 139 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRANSAERO, INC.$330.1M−14% in FY2026
    MELVILLE, NY · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+3 more
  2. MOOG INC$403.3M−35% in FY2026
    EAST AURORA, NY · 22 entities · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+5 more
  3. ROCKMART FUEL CONTAINMENT, LLC$166.6M−80% in FY2026
    ROCKMART, GA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EATON CORPORATION (63 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • EATON CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$965K
16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.7M
$3.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$55.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.1M
    16 reports
  2. 2024$980K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$965K
    16 reports
  4. 2026$680K
    9 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations45 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear43 reports
  3. Defense33 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code26 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)23 reports
  6. Automotive industry14 reports
  7. Environment and Superfund14 reports
  8. Transportation14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES57 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE57 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)31 reports
  4. Energy - Dept of21 reports
  5. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)20 reports
  6. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)14 reports
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)14 reports
  8. Federal Highway Administration (FHA)14 reports
  9. Natl Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)14 reports
  10. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$920K
    14 reports
  2. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$740K
    15 reports
  3. Jim Massie & Partners, LLC$390K
    12 reports
  4. RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP LLC$120K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$49.5K89%
  2. Democratic$6,00011%

PACs sponsored

  • EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC POLICY ASSOCIATION$30.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.